Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Excess Equity Trailer Bill topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HCD seeks statutory authority to extract 'excess equity' from funded projects to seed preservation and new production
Summary
HCD presented trailer‑bill language that would let the department permit developers to withdraw excess equity from existing HCD‑funded projects and redirect it to preserve or build other affordable housing; the Legislative Analyst recommended the Legislature consider statutory guardrails or a reporting requirement before granting broad authority.
The Department of Housing and Community Development told the Assembly subcommittee it wants statutory authority to allow extraction and reinvestment of "excess equity" held in existing HCD‑funded affordable housing projects.
Jennifer Seeger, deputy director for state financial assistance at HCD, said the proposed trailer‑bill language would "allow the state to utilize previous investments in affordable housing to support the preservation across the state's portfolio of projects" by enabling developers to withdraw cash from projects that have accumulated equity and direct it to projects with greater subsidy needs.
The Legislative Analyst's Office told the committee that, if enacted, the authority could unlock tens of millions of dollars annually but recommended that the Legislature consider whether the statute should include explicit limits or direct HCD to return a proposed policy for legislative review. "If the legislature is concerned about HCD's final policy ... one option could be to direct HCD to seek feedback on a potential policy, then report back to the legislature with findings," the LAO said.
Committee members showed support for the concept while expressing caution about drafting language that could include unintended constraints or administrative delays. One legislator urged clarity about timelines for HCD review so developers are not delayed by protracted departmental processes.
Why it matters: HCD and stakeholders argued the approach could create a revolving source of funds that helps preserve or build affordable homes without an immediate general‑fund appropriation. The LAO and members emphasized trade‑offs between flexibility for HCD and legislative oversight; several members suggested statutory guardrails or a required report back before broad implementation.
Public commenters including the California Housing Consortium and California Housing Partnership registered support for the trailer language, urging the Legislature to adopt measures that unlock private equity to stretch public dollars.
