Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends "do not pass" on study to provide additional legislative staff
Summary
The committee recommended "do not pass" on House Concurrent Resolution 3033, a proposal to study providing additional staff resources to legislators, citing cost, turnover and logistical concerns.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Finance and Taxation Committee recommended "do not pass" on House Concurrent Resolution 3‑033, a study resolution that would have examined providing additional staff to individual legislators.
Proponents said a study could clarify costs and models used in other states. Senator Wallin said a study would "give us an idea" of options and costs. Opponents raised concerns about cost and logistics: Senator Patton warned a fiscal note could be "quite high," and other senators questioned whether part‑time positions would deliver sustained value amid training costs and turnover. Several members suggested alternative approaches, such as extending introductory sessions for new legislators or expanding intern use.
After discussion, Senator Wallen moved a "do not pass" recommendation and Senator Powers seconded. The roll call recorded unanimous committee support for the recommendation. The clerk read the roll: Chairman Whitaker — Yes; Mister Romo — Yes; Senator Marsali — Yes; Senator Patton — Yes; Senator Powers — Yes; Senator Wallen — Yes. The transcript shows Senator Weber said he would carry the resolution.
Committee members did not adopt the study, and they cited uncertainty about whether part‑time staff would be effective given the legislature's biennial meeting schedule and potential training requirements.
