Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Harbor Moorings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harbor commission proposes mooring renewal timing change and new fee schedule; council directs solicitor to fold rates into fees resolution
Summary
Tiverton's Harbor Commission recommended moving mooring renewal notices from Dec. 15 to Jan. 3 and proposed fee increases. The council directed the solicitor to incorporate the new rates into the town's fees-and-fines resolution and asked staff to return with formal language.
Get email alerts on the Harbor Moorings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Town Council reviewed two items from the Harbor Commission on March 24: a proposed schedule change for mooring renewals and a recommendation to adjust mooring fees.
Harbor staff said the existing December 15 renewal date was difficult to meet for the mooring contractor and town staff, especially since the town launched an online mooring platform. Staff proposed changing the renewal-mailing date to January 3 and explicitly authorizing email notices. Councilors generally supported the change and asked staff to bring a formal ordinance amendment and advertisement to a future agenda.
Harbor assistant Dave Vania and commission members presented a recommended update to the mooring-fee schedule. The town's current approach uses boat length plus a base fee; staff said some registrants had been registering small dinghies to avoid larger-length charges. The proposed schedule increased certain categories, including nonresident/commercial fees, and added more explicit charges for riparian/guest moorings and the online-service per-mooring administrative fee.
Councilors expressed two priorities: (1) ensure any fee increase is proportional to the value of town mooring amenities compared with neighboring communities, and (2) ensure the fee changes are implemented within the town's fees-and-fines resolution or by ordinance so they are enforceable. Councilors asked staff to clarify application of the online-service fee and to propose adjustments to the ordinance on how moorings that are unpaid or unoccupied will be managed.
Councilor Denise Demidaris moved that the solicitor incorporate the proposed mooring fees into the town's fees-and-fines resolution or otherwise determine the appropriate procedural vehicle for adopting the new schedule. The motion passed; staff will return with the formal language and proposed effective date (staff suggested July 1).
Why it matters: Mooring fees produce recurring revenue and influence harbor use and fairness among resident and nonresident boat owners; enforcement and monitoring practices determine whether moorings are used by registered owners.
What happens next: The solicitor will draft or incorporate the new fee schedule into the fees-and-fines resolution with an effective date and return to council for final adoption; staff will also present possible ordinance changes to streamline unpaid/mooring vacancy enforcement and the renewal schedule.

