Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
York Suburban outlines special-education plan as out-of-district placement costs ease from prior year
Summary
District staff presented a three-year special education comprehensive plan draft, citing adoption of MTSS and program changes that reduced evaluations and out-of-district spending compared with last year, while recommending expanded district-run services and staff to control costs and improve services.
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dr. Sherry Campbell presented the York Suburban School District’s special education comprehensive plan and recommended steps to expand in-district services to reduce reliance on outside placements.
The presentation reported the district’s December child count at roughly 452–454 students and said 42 students were in outside placements. "Last year alone, the district spent just shy of $3,800,000 on out of district placements. Currently this school year, we're at currently here in March, we're at, 2,800,000.0," Dr. Campbell said. She said the district is using Multi-Tiered System of Supports, or MTSS, which has reduced some initial evaluations and increased the “hit rate”—the percentage of evaluated students who qualify for special-education services.
The draft plan must be posted on the district website for 28 days for public comment, Dr. Campbell said, and she told the board she planned to return on April 28 to seek approval, after which the district would submit the plan to the Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Why it matters: out-of-district placements are a major expense for the district budget, and the administration framed bringing more programs in-house as a way to control costs and increase local oversight of curriculum and staffing.
Key points from the presentation and Q&A: - Child count and placements: Dr. Campbell said the district’s December child count was about 452–454 students and that 42 were in non‑district placements; 30 of those were in LIU (Local Intermediate Unit) programs and others were in center- or district-based programs or neighboring districts. - Cost and trend: Dr. Campbell reported last year’s out‑of‑district spending near $3.8 million and current-year spending around $2.8 million, and warned contract rates at some providers are rising (she cited projected service increases of 7–8 percent for budgeting). Board members pressed whether the trend might continue. - MTSS effect: The district credited adoption of MTSS at the elementary and middle-school levels with higher evaluation hit rates in recent years; Dr. Campbell said the hit rate on initial special-education evaluations rose to about 88.5 percent this school year, compared with a lower rate prior to MTSS implementation. - Staffing and program changes: Dr. Campbell recommended hiring a district Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) rather than contracting long term, and keeping the district’s Registered Behavior Technician (RBT) link to implement behavior plans. During the meeting administrators put contracted RBT cost at about $84,770 and described a contracted BCBA cost as roughly $100,000 if hired directly by the district. - Grants and sustainability: Dr. Campbell said the district has a PCCT grant that supports some positions (RBT and a student-assistance specialist) and that the district expects to receive the grant for 2025–26 but must apply annually. Board members asked for a clear breakdown of what services are grant-funded versus funded by local taxpayers.
Board reaction and follow-up: Board members and the treasurer requested additional clarifying numbers for budgeting, including a line-item breakdown of grant vs. taxpayer-funded special-education staff and a school‑by‑school distribution of initial evaluations and placements. Board member Mister Desai called the special-education staff “an asset to this district,” and urged follow-up on cost and duration of placements. Dr. Campbell agreed to provide more detailed figures at a future meeting.
Ending: The board heard the plan as an informational presentation; Dr. Campbell will post the draft for public review and return April 28 seeking board approval and subsequent submission to PDE.

