Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Renewal Housing Strategy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission issues SEQR negative declaration for Syracuse Housing Strategy urban renewal plan update
Summary
The commission certified a SEQR negative declaration and discussed how the Syracuse Urban Renewal Agency (SURA) will use urban-renewal powers to implement the city's recently adopted housing strategy.
The Syracuse Planning Commission on April 7 issued a State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) negative declaration for an amendment updating the Syracuse Urban Renewal Agency (SURA) plan to align with the Syracuse Housing Strategy adopted by the Common Council.
Michelle Sapanski, Deputy Commissioner of Neighborhood Development, told the commission the update is intended to enable SURA to deploy implementation tools for the housing strategy, including targeted financial assistance for homeowners and coordination of programmatic responses in neighborhoods at risk of decline. Sapanski said city and outside legal counsel recommended using the urban renewal plan to provide the authority SURA needs to allocate public funds while remaining in compliance with state law governing use of municipal funds for private residences.
Commissioners reviewed whether the plan conforms to the comprehensive plan and noted it advances multiple goals, including periodic neighborhood plan revisions and support for homeownership and neighborhood stabilization. Commissioners and staff discussed that SURA’s boundary and activities will focus on both distressed areas and "vulnerable to decline" neighborhoods identified in the housing strategy. Sapanski said the city intends rolling waves of neighborhoods, with baseline reassessments roughly every five years and annual checkpoints for metrics such as homeownership rates and crime.
The commission performed the SEQR review and voted to issue a negative declaration, determining the plan would not create moderate or large environmental impacts and that no environmental impact statement was required. Commissioners did not make a final council recommendation during the session; staff said SURA’s board had already approved the draft plan and the administrative steps will continue under the City’s procedures.
Sapanski said the urban renewal plan amendment will give SURA more flexibility to provide financial assistance for rehab and preservation while maintaining compliance with New York General Municipal Law provisions governing urban renewal activities and municipal funding. The commission emphasized monitoring and reassessment mechanisms while recognizing the plan’s alignment with the broader city housing strategy and implementation corporation.
