Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sud Assessment Qualifications topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Proposal would let qualified mental‑health clinicians conduct SUD comprehensive assessments to ease rural shortages

2754634 · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate File 2647 would permit licensed mental‑health professionals to complete substance‑use disorder comprehensive assessments in certain settings, aligning Minnesota law with ASAM guidance and broadening the pool of clinicians who can authorize treatment in rural areas, proponents said.

Senate File 2647 would modify qualifications for comprehensive substance use disorder (SUD) assessments, allowing licensed mental‑health professionals to conduct assessments in addition to licensed alcohol and drug counselors in some settings. Supporters said the change would align Minnesota statutes with American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) standards and help address workforce shortages in rural areas.

Representatives from the Minnesota Alliance of Residential Treatment Providers (Maritap) and Woodland Centers described collaborative drafting of the bill and a compromise to narrow the change to comprehensive assessments (rather than all 245G services). Maritap board member Sadie Brockmire told the committee her clinic recently had to turn away a walk‑in assessment because no licensed drug and alcohol counselor was available while mental‑health‑licensed clinicians were on site and qualified to evaluate SUDs.

Woodland Centers CEO Ashley Chose, whose organization is a certified community behavioral health clinic serving seven rural counties, said ASAM 4 emphasizes multi‑dimensional evaluations by qualified clinicians and the bill would help ensure timely access to assessments without lowering clinical standards. The committee laid the bill over for further refinement and to work out remaining technical and training details with stakeholders.