Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Package Negotiations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conferees trade offers as tax-package talks continue; House offers 15% budget-stabilization share
Summary
House and Senate conferees continued negotiating a bundled tax package, with the House proposing a 15% allocation to the Budget Stabilization Fund and members debating which bill should carry an income-tax trigger and other provisions. No final votes were taken; conferees scheduled further meetings.
Conferees from the House and Senate met to work toward a bundled tax package, with the House offering to set the Budget Stabilization Fund at 15% as part of negotiations and both sides discussing where to place an income-tax "trigger" provision.
The session produced no formal votes. Members said they have several bills to put into conference and that they would continue negotiating text and bill assignments. A conferee listed bills that are in conference, and noted that Senate substitute for House Bill 2,125 has been non-concurred and still requires a motion to accede by the Senate before it is formally in conference.
Why it matters: The size of the Budget Stabilization Fund and the structure and placement of an income-tax trigger are central to the overall tax package. Those choices affect how and when revenue-triggered changes would take effect and which bill numbers carry various tax and levy provisions.
Details of the talks included which existing bills will serve as baselines for combined content and how many separate provisions can be bundled under committee rules. Conferees said they prefer to keep concepts grouped by subject (property tax, sales tax, income tax) so colleagues can follow the provisions more easily. One conferee suggested starting the package baseline with the Senate substitute for House Bill 2125 and considering additions from bills the Senate committee reviewed earlier.
A House conferee proposed the 15% figure for the Budget Stabilization Fund as a starting offer. Members said they expect give-and-take on other items, including BOTA filing-fee language, revenue-neutral provisions and how to package local sales tax authorities. The conference roster and the bills they discussed include multiple Senate and House numbers (as listed in the meeting): 2,231; 2,200; 705; 305; 2,207; 269; and House Bill 2,125 (non-concurred). The exact set of bills to be bundled remained under discussion.
Representative Sawyer, who pressed staff and members about calendar and workload effects, warned that tightening deadlines for clerks and treasurers will "squeeze that period" between local budget certifications and the mailing of tax statements.
Conferees set follow-up work and planned to reconvene later in the evening; one tentative meeting time discussed was 5:30 p.m. with the intent to have final language prepared for votes the following day if agreement can be reached.
