Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Division III proposes phased repayment to counties of unallocated FMAP funds, temporary 1% county cap increase

2754364 · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee leaders proposed repaying counties for federal Medicaid FMAP distributions that were retained at the state level during an early COVID-era FMAP enhancement, splitting approximately $22.5 million into four payments and adding an exigent one-percentage-point county cap premium that would expire at the end of the biennium.

Division III members discussed restoring federal Medicaid FMAP-related money counties say the state retained during the first six months of an enhanced FMAP allocation. Committee staff reported the disputed amount is about $22.5 million; rather than a lump-sum payment, county representatives agreed in hallway talks to accept the sum in four equal installments spread across two budget years.

Under the proposal, counties would receive four payments of $5.625 million each, effectively crossing two fiscal years and smoothing the state's cash-flow effect. Committee members who discussed the arrangement said they spoke to county representatives, including David Ross and Chuck Nickerson, who told legislators they did not anticipate opposition to a phased payment plan but had not conducted a formal countywide vote.

Separately, Division III advanced a temporary modification to the statutory county-cap law. New Hampshire's county-cap statute generally limits annual county property-tax increases to 2% to stabilize county billings; the division's HB2 amendment would raise the cap to 3% for the biennium, citing "exigent circumstances." The language included an explicit sunset provision to restore the 2% cap at the end of the biennium so counties would not expect a permanent change.

Committee members said the exigent premium was tied to the phased repayment: the proposal would hold back part of the phased payment (about $1.3 million in year one and $2.7 million in year two) to offset the one-percentage-point premium, easing the state's fiscal stress while giving counties some additional capacity for the current cycle.

Ending: The chair said the amendments were being introduced for committee consideration; members asked staff to circulate the exact HB2 amendment text and to reconvene for votes in the next session.