Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears public comment on proposed community benefits ordinance requiring developer negotiations
Summary
The council held a public hearing on a proposed Community Benefits Agreement ordinance that would require developers to negotiate community benefits with impacted wards and the citywide advisory council before council approval; supporters urged clarity in thresholds and definitions.
At a public hearing on the proposed Community Benefits Agreement ordinance (resolution 240,430.6), Councilwoman Mushet and other council members described the measure as a process to empower neighborhoods to negotiate benefits with developers. Under the draft language explained to the council, an affected ward would receive two additional members on a citywide advisory council for a project and the community would have a stated role in defining proportionate benefits prior to council consideration.
Council and public commenters focused on technical language and thresholds. Joel Arnold of Communities First urged clearer definitions for “developer” (to cover nonprofit LLCs that receive federal funds) and suggested clarifying whether recipients of certain city grants (HOME, CDBG, ESG) would be covered. Arnold also recommended a monetary threshold for covered projects and suggested Flint adopt a lower threshold than Detroit’s $75 million benchmark; he recommended $20 million as a possible threshold more proportional to Flint.
Council members and other public speakers also asked for clarity about how community benefits would be decided, whether benefits could include nonmonetary offerings such as volunteer programs and whether the process would avoid capturing small projects that lack capacity to negotiate. No council vote was taken at the hearing; the ordinance remains under consideration and may receive further technical edits.
