Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property And Leases topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Trustees review proposed lease change for telecommunications tower at 41 North Elliott; no decision made

2752354 · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Pryor Creek EDTA trustees discussed a proposed amendment to replace a remaining 41-year mobile-tower lease with a 99-year lease for $177,000 up front, requested financial analysis and clarification of maintenance obligations, and deferred a final recommendation to council.

The Pryor Creek Economic Development Trust Authority on Feb. 10 discussed a proposed amendment to the lease for a communications tower located at 41 North Elliott. The proposal would replace the remaining 41 years of a 50-year original lease with a 99-year lease in exchange for a one-time payment of $177,000.

Staff told trustees the existing lease began with an initial five-year term followed by nine successive five-year renewals and currently yields about $660 per month; under the existing escalation schedule, total payments over the original 50-year term were previously calculated to sum to $573,744.18. The proposed deal would provide a lump-sum payment now in exchange for long-term rights; staff noted the time value of money and advised a financial analysis to compare investing the upfront funds against continuing the monthly revenue stream.

Trustees identified several questions for follow-up: why a remaining 41-year lease would be extended to 99 years; whether any maintenance obligations (such as upkeep of the nearby Hidden Park) remained in the agreement; which lease terms had changed in renewals; and what the city currently uses the monthly revenue for. Staff said they would have a trustee (Scott) contact the tower company (Branch Towers) and return to the authority with detailed economics, comparisons to T-bills and CDs, and clarification on park maintenance obligations.

No action was taken at the EDTA meeting; trustees said they would provide a written economic comparison and consult with council before making a recommendation.