Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Miramar defers vote on resolution urging release of educational mitigation agreements to May 7
Summary
The commission unanimously agreed to defer a resolution seeking school-board release of long-standing educational mitigation agreements that apply to regional activity centers; commissioners asked for additional information from the school board and staff before taking action.
Get email alerts on the Education Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The commission on March 20 voted to defer consideration of a proposed resolution supporting release of so-called educational mitigation agreements that apply in certain Broward County activity centers. The item was delayed after commissioners requested more information and asked staff to consult with the school board and return with detailed analysis.
City staff explained the history: the tri-party educational mitigation framework dates to the early 2000s and ties developer student-station costs for schools to certain local activity-center projects. Staff said the mitigation formulas often exceed general county school impact fees and can impose large upfront obligations on projects in activity centers, which cities and developers say can impede redevelopment and affordable housing production.
Nut graf: Miramar is one of several Broward municipalities that have asked the school board to revisit or release the agreements because, staff and some municipal leaders say, the terms are outdated and create a disparity between fees charged in activity centers and standard school impact fees charged elsewhere in the county.
Commissioners asked for more detail on how the fee differences would translate into housing affordability and what specific changes the school board would consider; several commissioners asked to see the school board's position. The commission voted to defer the item to its May 7 meeting to allow staff time to collect additional information and to await an April 3 meeting of the school-board working group.
Ending: Staff said they will brief commissioners with granular comparisons of impact-fee scenarios, the working-group schedule, and any school-board responses before the May 7 meeting.
