Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting & Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debate surfaces split over proposal to disqualify blank votes on constitutional amendments
Summary
Representatives debated a proposal that would disqualify blank ballots on constitutional amendment questions; opponents said it would disenfranchise voters who leave questions blank due to confusion or time constraints, while proponents argued voters should be required to express a yes or no choice.
Members of the Hawaii House debated a measure discussed during floor consideration that would affect how blank votes on constitutional amendment (ConAm) questions are treated.
Representative Shimizu said she rose "in opposition" and argued the bill "would take away blank votes" and risked disenfranchising voters who leave questions blank for legitimate reasons. She offered examples of confusing amendment language and said some voters are undecided or lack time to research measures. "For that reason, I feel that we should not disqualify people who leave a blank," she said.
Other members spoke in favor of the approach. One representative argued that mail-in voting gives voters additional time to research and that, as members of the legislative body are asked to vote yes or no on measures, the public should similarly be expected to make a choice. The floor record also includes a comment that a recent Supreme Court decision struck down a proposed ConAm from the state because the language was not simple enough for the average person; the speaker used that history to argue for clearer ballot language and for higher expectations of voters who have time to research.
The transcript shows multiple members registered "in opposition," "reservations," and "strong support" as part of the standing committee report sequence; no roll-call tally specifically related to passage or defeat of a ConAm change is recorded in the excerpt provided.
