Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Decisions Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Abington Heights board approves personnel report, professional learning agreement, curriculum guide and service agreement
Summary
The Abington Heights School District board unanimously approved multiple routine items at its March 5 meeting, including the personnel report, a professional learning agreement with the Chester County Intermediate Unit, the 2025–26 high school curriculum guide, and a one‑on‑one PCA service agreement.
Get email alerts on the Board Decisions Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Abington Heights School District board unanimously approved several routine items during its March 5 meeting, including a personnel report, a professional learning agreement, a high‑school curriculum guide for 2025–26 and a service agreement for one-on-one personal care assistance.
The board approved the personnel report by roll call. The minutes show all seated members voting in favor; the board recorded a unanimous vote.
The board also approved an agreement with the Chester County Intermediate Unit to provide customized professional learning on the Danielson framework and Datawise professional learning. The motion passed on roll-call votes recorded as affirmative by the members present.
Members approved the 2025–26 Abington Heights High School curriculum guide after a motion to consider the guide. Board members praised administration and curriculum staff for their work preparing the guide.
Separately, the board approved an agreement with the Western Pennsylvania School for the Deaf to provide an additional one-on-one personal care assistant (PCA) for a student for the 2024–25 school year. The motion passed by unanimous roll call.
All votes listed in the meeting transcript recorded affirmative votes from the following board members: Mr. Abdullah, Mr. Azar, Mrs. Henderson, Mrs. Hillebrand, Mrs. Karam, Mr. Robeson, and Mr. Acker. Where individual mover/second names were not recorded on the transcript, motions and seconds were noted verbally but not attributed to specific members in the record.

