Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Engine Brakes Noise topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves local penalties for loud engine brakes; debate centers on rural impact

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The North Dakota House approved Senate Bill 2253, allowing local bans and penalties for engine compression brakes where signage prohibits their use, by a vote of 54‑40 after extensive floor debate over rural safety and enforcement.

The North Dakota House on Wednesday approved Senate Bill 2253 by a vote of 54‑40, a measure intended to allow cities and counties to prohibit the use of engine compression brakes (often called "Jake brakes") where signage prohibits them and to provide a penalty for violations, with exceptions for emergency situations.

Representative Koppelman, the bill carrier, told the chamber the measure targets commercial motor vehicles and is intended to give law enforcement authority to enforce local ordinances where signage is posted. "If you're operating a commercial motor vehicle in a time other than in an emergency, that you can't use an engine brake if there's signage that suggests that you're not supposed to do that," he said on the floor. The committee recommended the bill with amendments; the transportation committee vote was recorded as six yeas, five nays and three absent or excused.

Floor debate was lengthy and divided. Opponents said the bill unfairly burdens farmers and truckers and could create safety hazards on rural roads where engine brakes are used to assist stopping heavy loads. Representative Fraley said, "I think this bill is over regulation," and urged a red vote, warning that rural drivers may need the braking option on hills. Representative Brandenburg, a farmer, described the risk of brake overheating and loss of braking power if engine brakes are prohibited in certain situations.

Supporters and committee members emphasized the bill targets loud, aftermarket modifications and preserves emergency exceptions. Representative de Ruby, chairing the transportation committee, told the House the bill addresses locations—typically residential areas with nearby hills—where signage exists but enforcement lacked statutory backing. "This is for in areas where there's residential or specific purposes where they need them," he said. Several members recounted constituent complaints about loud engine brakes and noted that modern factory engine brakes are often quiet.

Truck drivers and industry voices spoke on the floor. Representative Rios, who said he has driven trucks in the oilfield for more than a decade, argued the technology is improving and engine brakes are getting quieter. Representative Richter and others said the bill mainly adds a penalty where signage already exists, and could address repeat violators who use loud aftermarket systems.

After debate, the clerk announced the final tally: 54 yay, 40 nay, and declared Senate Bill 2253 passed.