Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Food Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee opts for study amendment on cell‑cultured meat bill amid federal preemption concerns
Summary
Facing litigation and federal-regulatory questions, the Senate Agriculture and Veterans Affairs Committee attached an amendment converting House Bill 1151 into a study rather than imposing an outright ban on cell-cultured protein. Legislative counsel said one version would be an outright ban, a second would align state law with federal labeling
The Senate Agriculture and Veterans Affairs Committee considered House Bill 1151, a measure concerning cell-cultured protein and meat-labeling standards. Legislative Council staff presented three options: an outright ban (option 02/2001), a version aligning state statute with federal labeling and inspection laws (02/2002), and a study approach (02/2003).
Victoria Christian of the Legislative Council explained the options and legal considerations. She said the outright ban would prohibit manufacturing, selling and offering cell-cultured protein in the state, but that similar laws in other states face litigation. "There are 3 versions of amendments before you. The 02/2001 version goes back towards the bill as introduced. So this would be an outright ban on cell cultured protein within the state... There are 2 other states that are currently in litigation for legislation like this," Christian said. She described the 02/2002 version as aligning state law with federal statutes such as the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act; the 02/2003 option would convert the bill into a study.
Committee members voiced concern that the 02/2002 version could present litigation and preemption risks at the federal level; one senator said the federal regulatory definitions remain unresolved. The committee adopted Amendment 25.0487.02003 (the study option) and then voted to give the bill a due-pass recommendation as amended.
The roll on the amendment recorded: Senator Marsalais — yes; Senator Weston — yes; Senator Weber — yes; Chairman Lewick — yes; Vice Chair Bridal — aye; Senator Lund — aye. The subsequent due-pass roll recorded: Senator Marsalais — yes; Senator Weston — yes; Senator Weber — yes; Chairman Lewick — yes; Vice Chair Meerdal — aye; Senator Lehi — aye.
The transcript records committee members encouraging advocates to pursue federal action and identifying the study as the prudent state-level path where federal definitions are unresolved.
Votes at a glance: Amendment 02/2003 (study) — adopted; House Bill 1151 as amended — due-pass recommendation.
