Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Manipulation Ai topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs bill requiring disclosure of synthetic media in election communications
Summary
Senate Bill 816 would require disclosure when artificial intelligence‑generated audio/video is used in election communications within 90 days of an election. Sponsor and supporters described deep‑fake concerns; privacy and First Amendment groups warned about overbroad restrictions. Committee held the bill for further
Get email alerts on the Election Manipulation Ai topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 816, a measure intended to require more visible disclosure when synthetic media (AI‑generated audio or video) is used in election communications within 90 days of an election.
Sponsor’s case: Senator DePalma – working with the Secretary of State’s office and outside advocates – said the bill is meant to deter the misuse of artificial intelligence that could mislead voters in the run‑up to elections. “It's critical that we have put something in place sooner than later,” the senator said, recounting demonstrations of synthetic video and audio that can appear realistic and run continuously online.
What the bill requires: The measure would require visible, easily readable disclosures on synthetic video and clear spoken disclosures for synthetic audio used in campaign communications within 90 days of an election. It would create a private right of action for aggrieved parties and include exemptions for traditional media channels in specified circumstances.
Support and caution: Common Cause Rhode Island and other sponsors said disclosure is a narrower approach than an outright ban and is consistent with prior campaign disclosure laws. Support letters from industry groups were cited. The secretary of state’s office said it had worked with sponsors on draft language.
Free‑speech and enforcement concerns: The ACLU of Rhode Island testified in opposition, warning that the proposal regulates core political speech and could be overbroad in practice — for example, catching non‑commercial social posts or internal municipal messaging. Industry counsel from DISH and others asked for explicit exemptions for streaming platforms and clarity on intermediary liability.
Outcome: After testimony and clarifying exchanges, the committee held the bill for further study.
