Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

SSDIFC approves six new illuminated signs for Wynnewood Village

2716030 · March 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A city sign-review committee approved six illuminated signs for Wynnewood Village shopping center and also approved meeting minutes. The signs include two 1,020-square-foot pylon signs, two 110.7-square-foot monument signs and two 42.6-square-foot subdivision signs; all were approved unanimously.

The SSDIFC approved six certificates of appropriateness on a unanimous vote for new illuminated signs at Wynnewood Village shopping center in Oak Cliff.

Scott Roberta, supervisor for sign review inspections, presented the applications as “6 certificates of appropriateness” on behalf of SSC Signs and Lighting LLC and described the set of signs proposed for the Wynnewood Village Sign District. “These 6 CAs are applications... for 6 illuminated detached signs at the Wynnewood Village Shopping Center,” Roberta said. The committee discussed locations, dimensions, engineering and visibility before voting.

The applications covered three paired sign types: two multi-tenant pylon signs (applications 2502180023 and 2502180024), two multi-tenant monument signs (2502180028 and 2502180029) and two LED-illuminated subdivision signs (2502200005 and 2502200008). Roberta said the pylon signs each would have an effective area of 1,020 square feet and stand about 45 feet tall. The monument signs each would be about 110.7 square feet and no more than 6 feet tall. The subdivision signs would each be 42.6 square feet and not exceed 5 feet in height.

Committee members focused questions on sight-line and foundation details, engineering for wind loads and whether new signs would replace existing ones. Roberta confirmed the existing tower sign that the community values would remain; the six new signs would replace other existing pylons and monuments. On engineering, Roberta said the foundations and structural work had been completed to meet standards and that tenant panels would be filled later.

Members also discussed landscaping and an amended site plan tied to entrance reconfiguration; staff said tree impacts had been addressed through the site-planning process and the project team planned to replant on site where possible or mitigate through the city’s tree bank. Staff and applicants told the committee the signage would comply with visibility-triangle requirements and setbacks for driveway/street locations.

Votes at a glance: - 2502180023 & 2502180024 (two multi-tenant pylon signs, each 1,020 sq. ft., ~45 ft tall): Motion to approve made by David (member), seconded by Todd (member). Vote: unanimous approval (Murphy — approve; John — approve; David — approve; Todd — approve; Chair — approve). Outcome: approved. - 2502180028 & 2502180029 (two multi-tenant monument signs, each 110.7 sq. ft., ≤6 ft tall): Motion to approve, seconded; roll-call votes recorded as approving. Outcome: approved. - 2502200005 & 2502200008 (two LED subdivision signs, each 42.6 sq. ft., ≤5 ft tall): Motion to approve, seconded by Todd (member). Roll-call votes recorded as approving. Outcome: approved. - Approval of meeting minutes: Motion to approve by David (member), seconded by Commissioner Hall; roll-call votes recorded as approving. Outcome: approved.

The committee recorded the approvals as consistent with Section 51A-7.2400 (Wynnewood Village assigned sign district) and the sign-district rules. Committee members directed that future tenant-panel face replacements that meet the size limits will be processed as director approvals rather than returning to the committee, per staff guidance.

The committee meeting also included brief updates from the applicant and staff on nearby development at the center, including references to anchors and new tenants under construction, but no formal actions beyond the sign approvals and approval of minutes were taken on those matters. The SSDIFC adjourned after completing the agenda.