Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Budget And Taxes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House concurs with Senate on tax bill after hours of debate over triggers, grocery cut and fuel tax
Summary
The Mississippi House voted 92-27 to concur with Senate amendments to House Bill 1, a broad tax package that includes a trigger to reduce the individual income tax over time, a cut to the grocery tax and an increase to the fuel excise tax; lawmakers warned the changes could leave the state short if federal funding is reduced.
The Mississippi House of Representatives voted to concur with Senate amendments to House Bill 1, the multiyear tax-change package, by a roll-call of 92 yeas to 27 nays.
The Senate-added language moves a trigger mechanism that can reduce the state individual income tax rate over time if revenue and spending growth meet specified conditions, reduces the grocery sales tax from 7% to 5% in the first year, raises the motor fuel excise tax by 9 cents phased in at 3 cents per year for three years and includes new Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) language for future hires, according to a House explanation of the changes.
Supporters said the measure furthers a long-standing House priority to reduce or eliminate the income tax. In floor remarks after the vote, a Representative explaining the concurrence urged passage, saying, "let's end the tax on work once and for all in the state of Mississippi." The Representative identified the changes as compromises that the Senate had added and said portions of the revenue would be allocated to the Office of State Aid and to a multimodal fund at the Mississippi Department of Transportation.
Opponents warned the package could worsen state budget pressures if federal dollars decrease. Representative Miss Scott argued passage would force future lawmakers to make cuts to optional programs if federal funds decline, saying lawmakers should "pause" and consider the fiscal risks; she urged members to vote against the concurrence. Representative Hines, who spoke at length about education and health-care consequences, asked rhetorically, "How can a state as poor as Mississippi afford to do something like this?" and outlined concerns about the potential for program reductions under Medicaid and education if revenues fall.
Members pressed for detail on projected revenue effects. The House discussion included estimates described by a Representative as a rough projection that the income tax changes could reduce state revenue by "approximately $150 million" in the first year the changes take effect, but members noted estimates vary with assumptions about growth and timing. Members also discussed that a proposed stabilization fund was not included in this packet of changes and said capital expense and other reserve balances remain subject to future legislative decisions.
On procedure, the House debated whether the Senate-added trigger language was proper for a concurrence motion; counsel and the chair treated the measure as a concurrence rather than a conference report and allowed consideration under the concurrence rules. After debate and multiple members speaking for and against, the House recorded the 92-27 vote to concur.
The measure, as concurred to by the House, now returns to the Senate for final disposition or signature procedures per legislative rules.
Notes and next steps: the bill contains phased-in provisions and trigger language whose operation will depend on revenue and spending growth in coming years. Lawmakers signaled intentions to consider additional budget and capital measures in future bills to address reserve and stabilization funding.
