Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Structured Literacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Methacton board reviews three‑year structured‑literacy plan with lab schools, year‑one cost in proposed budget
Summary
District curriculum leaders and consultants presented a three‑year plan to shift Methacton schools from balanced literacy to a structured‑literacy approach, proposing two lab schools, Keys to Literacy professional learning and a $142,200 year‑one budget commitment to be considered next week.
Methacton School District curriculum staff on Tuesday presented a three‑year structured‑literacy plan that would change K–12 reading instruction districtwide, pilot two lab schools and bring Keys to Literacy and Schools Cubed coaches into classrooms.
The district’s director of curriculum and instruction, Dr. Walsh, told the Board of School Directors the plan responds to statewide changes in teacher‑preparation and reading policy — citing Act 55 and Chapter 49 regulations — and aims to move classroom practice from a balanced‑literacy model toward structured literacy grounded in the science of reading.
The plan proposes designating Eagleville Elementary and Kolb Intermediate School as “lab schools” where principals, reading specialists, intervention specialists and instructional coaches would receive monthly, job‑embedded coaching from Schools Cubed (now part of Keys to Literacy). The district said it would train roughly 80 staff across two cohorts (Keys to Beginning Reading for K–4 and Keys to Vocabulary for grades 5–12), certify several staff as coaches and trainers, and provide materials and on‑site coaching across the three‑year rollout.
District staff described the instructional materials and assessments the plan would use: Wonders as the K–6 core resource (with district coaching to align it to structured literacy), My Perspectives proposed for middle grades, DIBELS 8 as the universal screener, LinkIt benchmark assessments for grades 3–12 and diagnostic tools such as the Developmental Spelling Inventory and i‑Ready. For targeted literacy intervention, the district highlighted SIPs (Systematic Instruction in Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, and Sight Words) for K–12 and Read 180 for comprehension and vocabulary support.
Patty Montgomery of Schools Cubed described the lab‑school model as on‑site, month‑by‑month coaching and a diagnostic framework that looks at school systems and trends rather than single‑teacher critiques. Dr. Walsh said Schools Cubed would work with principals and instructional coaches to implement systems for assessment, lesson‑planning templates and progress monitoring.
District leaders tied the plan to measurable outcomes: classroom observations and walkthroughs aligned to the structured‑literacy framework, benchmark assessment gains across the year, and an expected reduction in special‑education referrals as instruction and interventions improve. Dr. Walsh told the board the administration will present a contract recommendation next week to lock year‑one pricing; she said a $142,200 commitment is currently factored into the proposed 2025–26 budget for year one of the work.
Board members pressed for operational details: why Eagleville and Kolb were chosen (both are Title I schools, district staff said), how training for a small cohort at a lab school will be cascaded back to other buildings, how many in‑service days would be required (Keys to Beginning Reading proposed as two days per year), and what data will be used to measure success (benchmarks, PSSA/Keystone comparisons and progress monitoring). Dr. Walsh and colleagues said the district will use common planning time, principal walkthroughs and coaching to scale practices to all buildings and will return periodic updates to the board.
No formal board vote was taken Tuesday. Administration said it intends to present the year‑one contract for board consideration at next week’s meeting.
