Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bannock County planning council reviews bylaws and duties, discusses conflict-of-interest guidance and findings practice
Summary
Council reviewed bylaws, Section 5.80 powers and duties, and received guidance on conflicts of interest and drafting findings; staff said legal counsel will review Idaho Code at the next meeting.
At its March 19 meeting, the Bannock County Planning & Development Council reviewed its bylaws, discussed Section 5.80 of the zoning ordinance (which lists the council's powers and duties) and received procedural guidance on conflict-of-interest disclosures and writing defensible findings.
Planning staff told the council the bylaws were last updated in 2022 and that any change would ultimately require a public hearing and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Staff also reviewed Section 5.80, which enumerates the council's duties, and urged council members to use that list when deliberating on variances, subdivisions and other land-use items.
Staff emphasized two recurring procedural practices: first, when council members are unsure how to start deliberations they should work through the required findings item by item, because a single negative finding means approval is not supportable; second, council members should not rely on the phrase "per staff report" as a substitute for written findings. The staff noted that findings must contain the council's legal reasoning so decisions are defensible on appeal.
On conflicts of interest, staff advised disclosure at roll call and said legal counsel would attend the next meeting to review Idaho Code guidance. Staff reiterated that if a member feels they should recuse themselves even after counsel's opinion, they may do so, and the council could also consider a procedure where the full council determines whether a member should recuse.
The council also received a brief calendar update. Staff said March 25 is a scheduled public hearing on the health plan; the April agenda will include a commission lease permit for a gravel pit (previously planned for the March meeting) and two variances—one for driveway width and one for side- and rear-yard setbacks.
Council members and staff framed the discussion as a refresher for three newly appointed members and as a reminder to document the factual bases for findings during hearings so the record supports the council's decisions if appealed.
