Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mepa Remedies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would codify remedies and remand standards for MEPA cases, remove injunction requirement
Summary
House Bill 270 clarifies how courts may remedy noncompliance with the Montana Environmental Policy Act by codifying standards for vacatur and remand and removing a 2023 requirement that plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction at the outset of litigation; DEQ, labor groups and environmental organizations backed the bill in committee.
House Bill 270 would amend remedy provisions for the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) to (1) clarify the findings a court must make before vacating a permit for MEPA noncompliance, (2) confirm that remand to the agency is an acceptable remedy, and (3) remove a 2023 statute that required a party seeking eventual vacatur to first seek a preliminary injunction at the outset of litigation.
Sponsor Rep. Katie Zolnikoff, joined by DEQ staff, said the changes respond to recent court guidance and would put the statute in plain language to instruct courts about remedial steps in MEPA cases. DEQ counsel told the committee the amendments reflect the state of the law after litigation addressing MEPA issues and are intended to increase judicial efficiency by allowing merits and record development to proceed before remedial issues are decided.
Supporters included the Montana Chamber of Commerce, building and construction trades, the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, the Montana Environmental Information Center, and the Montana chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Proponents described the bill as clarifying the legal standard, balancing environmental review and economic impacts, and reducing procedural burdens that can stall administrative record development.
In committee, advocates pointed to the "Laurel generating station" litigation (referenced in testimony) and said the bill codifies the court'directed remedial framework and prevents automatic vacatur absent judicial findings such as irreparable harm, narrow tailoring and public-interest considerations.
No opponents were recorded on the transcript and the hearing concluded with no committee vote recorded.
