Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Aging Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Age Friendly Minnesota council asks legislature to codify and continue work (SF2630)

2699137 · March 19, 2025

Summary

The Age Friendly Minnesota council briefed the committee on a multi-year effort to create a statewide blueprint for aging; sponsors asked the Legislature to codify and continue the council’s work past its current funding through 2027.

The Age Friendly Minnesota council told the Senate Human Services Committee that its statewide blueprint for aging recommends a long-term, cross-agency approach to help older Minnesotans ‘‘live well at home’’ and to adapt public infrastructure and services to a rapidly aging population.

Sherry Pugh, chair of Age Friendly Minnesota, described a multi-year effort that began under an executive order in 2019 and included statewide surveys, regional convenings and 88 community grants that tested local practices. ‘‘Age friendly is about…to have parking, to have parks where I can go with my grandchild, and I can be with my walker or wheelchair,’’ Pugh said, asking the committee to support codifying and continuing the council’s work beyond its current funding horizon.

Adam Sumala of the Minnesota Leadership Council on Aging told members the council’s ‘‘multi-sector blueprint on aging’’ offers a 10-year road map and urged legislators to avoid a short-term, piecemeal approach to aging policy. Sponsors said the governor’s budget did not include continued council funding and asked the committee to preserve the council as a standing commitment to aging policy. The committee laid SF 2630 over for possible omnibus inclusion.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source