Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: council adopts multiple consent items and individual motions on March 19, 2025
Summary
The council took a series of roll-call votes on consent and individual items; the clerk announced tallies for multiple items as recorded on the meeting floor.
The Los Angeles City Council conducted a sequence of roll-call votes on March 19, 2025, approving numerous consent items and individual motions during the session. The clerk announced tallies at several points in the meeting; listed below are items and outcomes as recorded in the public proceeding.
Summary of recorded votes (as announced at the meeting): - Consent batch (items 3, 5–8, 12, 14–15, and 18–27): clerk announced “13 in favor.” - Item 1 (taken for separate vote): clerk announced tally “2 in favor, 1 against” (vote taken on the floor as recorded in the meeting transcript). - Item 9 (separate): clerk announced “12 in favor.” - Item 10 (motion on homelessness contract oversight introduced by Councilmember Romen): clerk announced “13 in favor” (see separate article on homelessness oversight). - Item 4 (as modified): clerk announced “13 in favor.” - Later votes recorded during the meeting: item 11 (amendment circulated) — clerk announced “13 yes.” - Item 16 (amendment circulated) — clerk announced “13 yes.” - Item 28 (as circulated by Councilmember Price) — clerk announced “13 yes.”
Notes and caveats: the meeting transcript records the clerk’s announced tallies but does not always list individual member votes by name. Where the transcript stated only a numeric tally, this summary reports the announced counts. If a specific ordinance or resolution number was not read on the floor during the recorded exchange, the transcript did not provide that number; such items are listed here by agenda item number as announced at the meeting.
The council also held public comment on several agenda items and received presentations (for example, the port‑power briefing and the city financial-status report) that did not result in immediate roll-call votes. For details on specific items that generated substantive discussion, see separate articles on the port power briefing, the homelessness oversight motion, and the financial-status presentation.
