Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Math Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and students urge Montgomery board to restore accelerated middle-school math pathways
Summary
At the March 18 meeting, parents, students and higher-education faculty pressed the board to reinstate accelerated math pathways eliminated in recent curriculum changes, arguing the change reduces opportunities for advanced students and may affect college readiness and competitive outcomes.
Dozens of parents, students and educators used the March 18 Montgomery Township Board of Education meeting to press the district to restore accelerated middle-school math pathways and to request clearer evidence that the recent math-program changes will preserve advanced-course access at the high school.
Multiple students and parents described personal experience in the district’s former accelerated pathway — a multi-year sequence that placed qualifying students into pre-algebra and algebra earlier than the standard track so they could reach Algebra II and advanced calculus in high school. Students said the pathway supports participation in math competitions and deepens problem-solving skills; a Rutgers business-school director who spoke to the board said colleges increasingly expect applicants to have advanced quantitative preparation.
“I would like to do pre-algebra in fifth grade…please, please do not be unfair to me,” said a fourth-grade student, who spoke during the public-comment period. Other students and parents described state competition placements and urged the board to ensure equitable access to acceleration rather than relying on expensive summer programs that create an equity gap.
Board and committee discussion: the district’s ACI (Administration/Curriculum and Instruction) committee presented background material to trustees earlier, and the director of curriculum cited multiple data points — including developmental readiness and student achievement data — as drivers for recent course-sequence adjustments. District presenters said the revised middle-school pathways were intended to maintain a pathway toward AP Calculus BC for high-achieving students who follow a particular sequence.
Several trustees and committee members asked for additional analyses before the board takes any policy action. One board member requested percentile-growth analysis across cohorts (for example, separate trend lines for the top and middle percentiles), and trustees asked the administration to provide clearer elementary-level data on differentiation and early identification. The ACI chair and the curriculum lead agreed to continue the discussion in committee and to present further detail at future meetings.
No formal vote or policy change occurred at the March 18 meeting. Trustees directed staff to bring more data to the ACI committee, including elementary-level evidence of differentiation and a clearer mapping of how middle-school pathways feed into high-school AP opportunities.
Why it matters: changes to middle-school math sequencing affect students seeking acceleration in STEM pathways, may change demand for summer remediation or acceleration courses, and can shape long-term enrollment in AP-level math courses that university admissions and STEM programs consider in selection and placement.
What the board will do next: the ACI committee will continue the analysis and present supplemental information to the full board, and administrators said they would provide cohort growth analysis and clarify how revised pathways affect high-school course access.
