Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Commission Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: March 10 Sacramento County Planning Commission
Summary
The Planning Commission took four formal votes on March 10, approving two noncontested time extensions and a hotel and extending one item to a date uncertain; all actions passed unanimously.
The Sacramento County Planning Commission took four formal actions on March 10, 2025. All votes passed with the three commissioners present voting in favor.
Summary of votes
- Item 1 — Southeast Watt tentative map, time extension (PLMP20Four-one68 Vineyard Alberts): Motion to adopt staff recommendation passed unanimously. Roll call: Commissioner Corona Sabignano — yes; Commissioner Devlin — aye; Commissioner Borja — yes.
- Item 2 — Cambria Suites map (PLMP2020Four-one107 Natomas/Special Planning Area): The commission adopted staff recommendation, including notation that the FAA had approved the project's height. The applicant said construction was targeted to begin within about seven to 10 months. Roll call: Commissioner Corona Sabignano — yes; Commissioner Devlin — aye; Commissioner Borja — aye.
- Item 3 — South Sacramento Boat RV and Commercial Storage (PLMP2020Four-zero169): The commission approved a development plan review amendment, special development permit amendment and design review amendment and found the CEQA addendum adequate. The action extended the effectuation deadline to Aug. 24, 2026. Roll call: Commissioner Corona Sabignano — yes; Commissioner Devlin — aye; Commissioner Borja — yes.
- Item 4 — Continued item (applicant provided a signed tolling agreement): The commission voted to continue the item to a date uncertain; staff noted the tolling agreement extends to June 30, 2025 and the applicant expects to set a hearing before that date. Roll call: Commissioner Devlin — aye; Commissioner Corona Sabignano — yes; Commissioner Borja — yes.
Context and next steps
Most items were noncontested; staff presented the items and no written public comments were filed for items 1 and 2. Item 2 included confirmation the applicant had obtained FAA height approval. Item 3 included public speakers in favor and a split advisory committee record; staff will finalize any outstanding conditions (for example, idling language) before permit issuance.
Ending
All four items were decided at the March 10 hearing and will proceed according to the conditions set in the staff reports and the approvals recorded on the public meeting minutes.
