Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Aging Master Plan Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners support letting Aging use Carol Woods donation for Master Aging Plan projects
Summary
After hearing that the Master Aging Plan fund balance largely reflects Carol Woods donations and one‑time federal grants, commissioners agreed the department should continue spending the funds on MAP priorities; some asked staff to report spending plans as part of the upcoming budget process.
Commissioners heard an update on the Orange County Master Aging Plan (MAP) fund — the account that houses a long‑term donation from Carol Woods and program proceeds — and signaled support for allowing the Department on Aging to use those funds for MAP initiatives rather than redirecting them to general‑fund needs.
Budget staff told the board the MAP fund balance rose to about $6.5 million (including a late ARPA allocation of roughly $62,000 staff said will reduce MAP draw) primarily because of underspending and one‑time federal grants during and after the pandemic. The balance includes prior unspent Carol Woods donations earmarked to support MAP projects; staff said roughly $75,000 of the fund was reallocated to cover ongoing department work in the FY2025 budget.
Why it matters: The MAP is a community‑created strategic plan for aging; Carol Woods' charitable gift specifically supports the MAP. Commissioners debated whether the county should reassign balances to higher‑priority housing or one‑time needs or allow the Department on Aging to spend the funds on MAP projects.
Department on Aging and MAP projects: Janice Tyler and aging staff presented MAP initiatives that remain underway, including Fit Lot construction, wellness programming, video production and evaluation contracts. Tyler told the board that the department has completed or substantially advanced a majority of its MAP indicators and expects to expend MAP funds over the next two to three years to complete current projects and prepare for the next MAP cycle.
Housing repairs question: County housing and community advocates attending the meeting urged the board not to use MAP funds to fill the county's urgent repair or mobile‑home replacement needs because the MAP funding had been used to incubate and evaluate the home‑repair coalition. The Home Preservation Coalition coordinator said the coalition had used MAP resources to build the network that identifies and pursues larger, layered home‑repair funding and recommended seeking other funding sources for repairs.
Board reaction and decision: Commissioners generally favored keeping available MAP funds with the Department on Aging for MAP projects rather than reallocating them to general‑fund priorities. Several commissioners suggested a mix of approaches: allow the department to spend the funds on MAP projects while seeking additional, separate funding sources for large‑scale home repairs. The advisory board chair and a Carol Woods representative confirmed the gift had been intended to support the MAP.
Next steps: Staff said they will continue to coordinate MAP spending, provide regular updates to the board and finish current projects within the next two to three years. Several commissioners asked staff to include a MAP status update in the upcoming budget process.
