Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council advances sign‑code changes: banners limited, freeway‑oriented sign rules added

2682369 · March 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council held a public hearing and introduced a zoning sign‑code amendment (ZC24‑4) that would limit permanent banners, set a 1.5‑square‑feet‑per‑linear‑foot metric for wall signage, add explicit rules for freeway‑oriented freestanding signs and require a 75‑foot separation between freestanding and monument signs.

The Oroville City Council opened a public hearing on March 18 and introduced a zoning code amendment (ZC24‑4) to clarify and update sign regulations. Planner Connor Musler presented the changes, explaining the proposal aims to remove ambiguous provisions, reduce the number of permanent banners and create clear criteria for signs intended to be viewed from the freeway.

Key changes described by staff: - Prohibit permanent banners; allow temporary banners only for grand openings and special events without a permit for short periods. - Limit wall signage to a maximum of 1.5 square feet per linear foot of building frontage, and one wall sign per frontage facing a street or parking lot. - Establish rules for freeway‑oriented freestanding signs: within a quarter‑mile of a freeway off‑ramp qualifying sites could have taller, freeway‑oriented signage (up to 85 feet where permitted by code and safety review). - Require a 75‑foot separation between freestanding signs and monument signs on the same parcel. - Increase allowable sign height along State Route 162 to reflect heavy traffic and traveler orientation. - Expand and clarify use of voluntary sign programs so property owners can propose a comprehensive sign plan rather than seeking variances.

Musler said the changes are intended to reduce ad hoc variances, simplify staff review and make sign allowances consistent across zones. Councilmembers asked how temporary event and construction banners would be treated; Musler said the draft retains a separate temporary sign section that allows construction/site banners until a building is occupied, and separate rules govern special‑event signage.

No public speakers opposed the amendment at the hearing. Councilmembers introduced the ordinance for first reading and staff said, if no substantive changes are requested, it could return on consent for second reading and adoption.