Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission backs annexation, general plan and zone change for Amber industrial site with conditions

2681669 · March 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission recommended annexing and rezoning a county island near Lund Highway to INM‑1 light industrial, approving a general plan amendment and urging a development agreement to secure a buffer wall and deed restrictions limiting through‑traffic and future subdivision.

The Cedar City Planning Commission recommended approval of an annexation, a general plan amendment and a zone change to INM‑1 (light industrial) for a county island adjacent to 3700 West / 600 North, a site described in hearing materials as the Amber Industrial parcel.

Phil Schmidt of P & J Development described prior negotiations with adjacent neighborhood residents and staff, explaining the developer removed a residential component from earlier concepts after neighbors raised traffic concerns. Schmidt said the developer and staff worked with neighbors to minimize access points and that the parcel would be devoted to industrial uses with a single gated access for operations and a separate access for sewer and detention maintenance.

Staff and commissioners discussed buffers between industrial and residential areas. Planning staff said the site will be in the INM‑1 zone and noted that a buffer wall along the west property line had been discussed; staff recommended formalizing those commitments through an annexation agreement or development agreement to provide protections that the zoning ordinance alone does not guarantee.

Public comment included Dan Massaras, a Monte Vista resident and member of the local water board, who said the neighborhood opposed residential development because narrow local streets could not handle subdivision traffic and that they preferred light industrial uses over additional residential traffic. Another Monte Vista resident, Bob Ellerson, voiced support for the change to light industrial and for the jobs the industrial land may bring.

The commission made a positive recommendation on the annexation conditioned on a development agreement that would document protections for the neighborhood (well protection areas, commitments on access and a potential wall). Commissioners also voted to recommend the general plan amendment and the rezone to INM‑1; staff said the annexation would fill a county island and that engineering and legal checks had been completed for the civic notifications and requirements.

If the council approves the annexation, staff recommended including the development agreement terms (access limitations, well protection, and wall specifications) before final acceptance.