Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Regional Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Riverton staff to send feedback to Wasatch Front Regional Council; council requests parks and correct transit alignment

2679799 · March 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff and council reviewed the Wasatch Choice regional vision, requested two local parks be added to the plan and objected to a proposed rail alignment through private property; staff will send formal feedback by the April 4 deadline.

Riverton ' City planning staff briefed the council on the Wasatch Choice 2050 regional vision and asked for any additional comments before an April 4 submission deadline.

Staff said the regional draft shows a long-term rail/major-transit alignment running along 130 Fourth and the Welby Jacob Trail adjacent to Mountain View Village; staff and several council members told the regional planners that routing along that exact corridor is inappropriate because it would cross private property and conflict with local plans. Staff recommended instead that the regional plan continue along 132 South or Majestic Rise to connect at 126, noting that a bus or bus-rapid-transit alternative would be the near-term locally preferred option.

Staff also flagged two planned city parks (10-acre and 16-acre sites) that are missing from the regional map and requested they be added to ensure consistency between city plans and the regional vision. Council member Perucci and others supported including aspirational long-term transit possibilities in the regional plan but urged that local staff commentary be clear about preferred alignments.

Ending: Staff said it will finalize and transmit Riverton's feedback to the Wasatch Front Regional Council by the stated deadline and will circulate the proposed comment letter to council members for review before submission.