Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Investigation Hannah topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CPOB splits on investigator’s exoneration in Elijah Hannah arrest; accepts two other findings, declines two independent probes
Summary
Investigator Greg Huff reported that OCPO’s determinations in the Elijah Hannah arrest were: false arrest — exonerated; discourtesy — unfounded; racial profiling — not sustained. The CPOB rejected the exoneration finding but accepted the other two findings.
The Community Police Oversight Board on March 11 considered an OCPO independent investigation into the October arrest of Elijah Hannah and voted separately on three allegations after extended discussion.
Investigator Greg Huff reported that OCPO’s determinations were: allegation 1 (false arrest) — exonerated; allegation 2 (discourtesy/unprofessionalism) — unfounded; and allegation 3 (racial profiling) — not sustained. Huff said he used the city’s standard categorizations and that “exonerated means the action happened... but we determined it was a lawful action by the police department.”
Board members asked detailed procedural questions about probable cause, impairment testing and whether a later court outcome could change the board’s finding. After debate, the board voted to separate the three allegations for individual votes. The board did not accept the OCPO’s exoneration finding for the false‑arrest allegation (the motion to accept that finding failed). The board accepted the OCPO’s finding that discourtesy was unfounded and accepted the OCPO’s finding that racial profiling was not sustained (that vote passed unanimously).
Why it matters: The board’s decision to reject the exoneration finding on a false‑arrest claim, while accepting the other two findings, highlights a divergence between the investigator’s view of probable cause and some board members’ concerns about the case’s ultimate merits. The board discussed whether terms such as “exonerated” should be used before criminal proceedings are concluded.
The board also considered two separate requests for independent OCPO investigations. The first involved a complaint by Eric Williams alleging an unlawful search and other misconduct during a domestic dispute; after brief discussion the board voted that the OCPO should not conduct a separate independent investigation. The second involved a complaint connected to a Ruston, Louisiana, incident raised by Dallas Sergeant Gray and by Ruston police chief Steven Rogers; the board likewise voted not to direct the OCPO to pursue an independent investigation on that matter.
Board members noted the limits of the OCPO’s determinations versus criminal proceedings and discussed follow‑up options — including whether to send letters or recommendations to the police chief — but made no additional board directives at the meeting.
Ending: The board closed the agenda item after voting on the three findings and declining the two independent investigation requests; members asked staff to advise what next steps, if any, are available to complainants or the board formally.
