Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fence Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears first reading on front-yard fence rules for major thoroughfares; discussion leans to uniform 4-foot height
Summary
City planner LaSheila Jones presented a first reading of Ordinance O-05-25 to allow non-opaque front-yard fences along major thoroughfares. Council members debated height limits and uniformity, with several favoring a 4-foot standard and a variance process for taller fences.
The Glen Heights City Council received a first reading on Ordinance O-05-25 on March 20, a proposed amendment to Chapter 15 (landscape and screening regulations) to permit non-opaque front-yard fences on lots that front major thoroughfares.
City Planner LaSheila Jones told council the amendment would allow non-opaque fences on residential front yards along specified major roads — including Bear Creek Road, Hampton Road, Ewell Road and Southwest — built of stained wood, wrought iron or similar decorative materials with a minimum height of 4 feet and a maximum height not to exceed 6 feet. The proposal would not apply to lots with side access or properties within master-planned subdivisions.
The planner said the change is intended to address safety concerns on busier roads and to give property owners an option they do not currently have. “Because there is more traffic on these roads, it does pose some concerns for residents,” Jones said. Staff recommended approval of the ordinance as written for a first reading.
Council members discussed aesthetics, safety and enforcement. Council Member Lightfoot asked whether code enforcement would handle fences that fall into disrepair; Jones said code enforcement would be responsible. Several council members said they support allowing decorative, non-opaque fences but expressed concern that a 6-foot front fence could create a “compound” appearance and reduce visibility for public safety.
Mayor Pro Tem Binford asked staff to research a 2021 Texas legislative change affecting homeowner associations and front fences; Council Member Garrett and others urged that the ordinance allow the council to hear variance requests for taller fences rather than creating broad height exceptions.
Several council members, including Hale and Bridal, voiced a preference for a single, uniform height — with several saying 4 feet would balance visibility and safety. Others favored retaining 6 feet as a possible maximum with a variance process. Jones and the city attorney noted that the SUP (special use permit) or variance processes remain available for exceptions and that staff can add a provision authorizing council to grant variances at second reading if council desires.
No vote was taken on O-05-25 at first reading; council provided direction to staff to refine language to reflect discussion and to research statutory constraints and precedent. Members who asked for more detail said staff should return the ordinance for second reading with clarified height and variance language.
