Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee requests clearer rules on student-created web content and consistent vendor rules for athletic banners
Summary
Members asked staff to clarify who owns digital content created on district time or equipment and to standardize athletic banner vendors and procedures after concerns about QR codes and commercial links on banners.
The Richmond Community Schools policy committee reviewed a proposed update to the district’s web content, apps and services policy and asked staff to clarify intellectual-property ownership for student-created content, platform hosting rules, and standards for athletic banners that have included QR codes linking to private photographers.
Why it matters: teachers and students create digital content on school time and equipment; committee members said the policy should make clear when content is the student’s intellectual property and when the district owns or has license to use material created under contract time.
Highlights from the discussion: - Ownership and hosting: Members asked that the policy explicitly state that student-created content produced in class is the student’s intellectual property, while content produced by staff during contract time or specifically commissioned by the district should be considered district property or licensed to the district. The committee requested clearer language distinguishing school-sponsored publications hosted on district servers from personal social-media use by staff or students. - Third-party platforms and social media: Committee members asked for simpler, clearer terms explaining acceptable platforms, moderation and how student consent will be obtained for publication. Staff noted related policies (including policy 5722 and social-media policy 7544) will need to align. - Athletic banners and commercial links: Members raised specific examples of banners that included large QR codes linking to private photography or a vendor’s commercial website. The committee asked the athletic department to catalog current banner vendors and recommended a consistent vendor or standard so banners do not function as personal advertisements.
The committee asked Jeremy (technology lead) and Alex (communications/athletics staff referenced) to review the draft, propose clearer ownership language and recommend a standard process for athletic banners and external vendor use. Staff will return with revised policy language and a recommended approach for banner procurement and digital-content ownership.
