Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fences Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies 8‑foot front‑yard fence request in Hillcrest Estates area
Summary
The Board of Adjustment unanimously denied a request to allow an 8‑foot front‑yard fence at 11322 East Ricks Circle, citing neighborhood character and proximity to existing low fences and hedges.
The Dallas Board of Adjustment on March 18 denied a special‑exception request (BDA245‑034) to construct an eight‑foot fence in the front yard at 11322 East Ricks Circle.
The board voted 5‑0 to deny the application after neighborhood representatives and several board members said an eight‑foot front yard fence would be out of character on that block. Rob Baldwin presented the application on behalf of property owners E. Pierce Marshall Jr. and said the fence would be largely open decorative iron panels set back roughly 20–25 feet from the curb; columns and gate elements would reach 8 feet.
Neighbor opposition was led by Noel Barrick, a retired architect and member of the Hillcrest Estates Plan Committee, who said the neighborhood’s private deed restrictions and long‑standing plan committee guidance discourage front‑yard fences and that the community largely renews and enforces those restrictions. “Approving this request would set a precedent that goes both against our deed restrictions and the city zoning laws,” Barrick told the board.
Board members questioned whether the board could enforce private deed restrictions (staff and the board attorney said the board is not a party to private deed‑restriction enforcement) but noted the board’s statutory standard: a special exception may not adversely affect neighboring property. Several members said the area’s prevailing character — yards defined by hedges or low fences rather than tall, solid walls — weighed against approval. Board member Andrew Finney moved to deny without prejudice; the motion carried 5‑0.
Votes at a glance: BDA245‑034 (11322 East Ricks Circle) — Motion to deny without prejudice passed 5‑0. The record includes letters of support from two nearby neighbors and a written opposition from the plan committee and at least one adjacent neighbor.
Context and next steps: The decision is without prejudice, which allows the applicant to return if they wish to revise the design or provide additional information. The board noted landscaping is not something it can bind as a condition in the same way as a fence permit; any landscaping promises are informational unless captured in a site plan the board approves.
