Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technology Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee moves language banning foreign-adversary genetic sequencers into AI bill; committee weighs single-subject concerns
Summary
The committee voted to move the contents of Senate Bill 234—which would bar state medical and research facilities from using genetic sequencers or analysis software made by specified foreign adversaries—into House Bill 2,313 after debating single-subject and testimony concerns.
The Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs voted to remove the contents of Senate Bill 234 and insert them into House Bill 2,313 (creating a senate substitute), after staff described the bill and members discussed related measures.
Jason, a staff member, summarized Senate Bill 234 as prohibiting medical and research facilities in the state from using genetic sequencers and software for genetic analysis that are produced by specified foreign adversaries; the bill defines "foreign adversary" by reference to named nations in federal guidance. Jason said the bill includes a reimbursement scheme for replacement costs if requests are submitted to the state treasurer by Oct. 1, 2025 and if sufficient appropriations exist to reimburse facilities.
Committee members discussed whether to combine SB 234 with House Bill 2,313, a short bill proposed to prohibit use of the DeepSeek artificial-intelligence platform (described in committee testimony as a Chinese AI platform) on state devices and networks. Senator Clifford said the measures "deal with technology and the provision of that technology by foreign countries" and noted a common nexus; committee counsel advised that combining bills risks a two‑subject constitutional challenge but that a common technology nexus could support a single subject. The chair moved to remove SB 234's contents and place them into HB 2,313 as a senate substitute; Senator Clifford seconded. Several members objected to using the one-page bill as a shell because that bill had not received testimony.
The committee voted; the motion to move SB 234 into HB 2,313 was seconded and the chair called for ayes and nos. The transcript records both aye and no voices and indicates the motion carried and the senate substitute for House Bill 2,313 proceeded to further committee action. The committee later moved a favorable substitute for House Bill 2,313 as amended.
Discussion versus decision: committee debate focused on constitutional single-subject risk, overlap between prohibiting specified foreign AI platforms on state devices and banning foreign-adversary genetic sequencers at state facilities, and the presence or absence of testimony on the house-shell bill. The record shows motions to transfer SB 234 into HB 2,313 and later to pass the senate substitute for HB 2,313 favorably.
