Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pbm Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate file 1574 would push Minnesota toward a single‑PBM model for Medicaid, sponsors say
Summary
Senate file 1574, sponsored by Senator Mann and amended in committee, would require Minnesota Medicaid managed care plans to use a single contracted PBM and a state‑preferred formulary, a model sponsors said has saved other states millions. The bill was laid over for further work and a fiscal note.
Senate file 1574, presented by Senator Mann with an adopted author's amendment, would move Minnesota's Medical Assistance pharmacy benefit toward a single‑PBM (pharmacy benefit administrator) model for managed care, with a state‑selected preferred drug list and transparent pricing.
Sponsor rationale and evidence from other states: Senator Mann said the single‑PBM model, first implemented in Kentucky, prevents PBM practices such as spread pricing, clawbacks and opaque rebate chains and has generated large savings in other states. The sponsor cited Kentucky, Ohio, Louisiana and Mississippi as states that reported multi‑year savings after adopting similar models. Testifying pharmacists said the single‑PBM approach would increase transparency and allow the state greater control over reimbursement rates to ensure pharmacies receive payment closer to the true acquisition and dispensing cost.
Concerns and operational questions: Committee members asked about implementation risks, timing, and whether state agencies would be administratively prepared to operate a pass‑through or pharmacy‑benefit‑administrator model. Sponsor and testifiers emphasized that the bill uses a private contractor to administer the benefit under state rules rather than creating a new state agency; proponents said Ohio officials reported direct savings that reached hundreds of millions of dollars in the first years after implementation.
Committee action: The committee adopted an author's amendment and laid Senate file 1574 over for possible inclusion; members requested a fiscal note and additional details about operational timelines and vendor selection.
