Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand Island board tables Gulfside Gulfview rezoning after developer presentation, strong public opposition
Summary
The Town Board voted to table a proposed PDD overlay and rezoning for the Gulfside Gulfview development after a developer presentation and multiple residents raised concerns about density, lot sizes and procedure.
The Town of Grand Island Town Board on March 3 tabled action on the Gulfside Gulfview rezoning request, a multi-parcel proposal that would apply a planned development district (PDD) overlay to properties currently shown as R1B and R2 and change portions to B1. The move followed a presentation by the applicant's representative and extensive public comment opposing the plan.
The applicant's representative, Sean Hopkins, said the proposal has been before the planning board and the economic development committee and that the planning board had once again recommended approval of a PDD overlay with one condition: that lots on the southern portion of the Loop Road abutting East River Road be increased to meet R1C requirements (100 feet of frontage and 20,000 square feet). Hopkins said the developer has adjusted lot dimensions to better align with existing properties and that an updated local law, SEQR (environmental) determination and draft decision will be prepared if the board directs further action.
Why it matters: The proposal would change zoning and allowable uses on multiple parcels and establish a PDD overlay that would dictate density and lot sizes. Residents said the plan conflicts with the town’s master plan and could increase density outside the town center.
Board discussion focused on technical changes and next steps. Supervisor Marston and other board members acknowledged the planning board's recommendation but emphasized additional materials would be required (an updated development concept plan and a draft local law). The board did not vote to approve the rezoning; instead, a motion to table the matter carried unanimously, sending the item back for further work and clarifications.
Residents who spoke at the public comment period urged caution and questioned the process. One resident who identified himself at the meeting said, “I urge you before you cast your vote to review a master plan, specifically, 4 0 7 1 22, a through e 1 through 4,” and warned that approval could conflict with density recommendations. Another resident, Hank Cushing, said the plan increased the number of townhomes from 48 to 53 and told the board, “You guys need to protect us. We voted for you.”
The motion to table passed on a roll call vote with board members DeGatti, Belito, Kilmer, Garcia and Marston recorded as voting in favor. The item will return after the applicant provides the updated materials and the town attorney and planning staff prepare draft documents and SEQR determinations as needed.
The town clerk or planning staff will post any revised submission and the next schedule for public hearings and planning board consideration on the town’s official website when available.
