Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parole Board Nominations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committees advance four parole board nominees after questioning on victims, public safety and rehabilitation
Summary
A joint Senate Finance and Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections committee meeting on June 11 advanced four nominees for the New York State Parole Board to the full Senate after questioning focused on how each would weigh victims' statements, public-safety risk and evidence of rehabilitation.
Get email alerts on the Parole Board Nominations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A joint meeting of the New York State Senate Finance Committee and the Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections Committee on June 11 advanced four nominees for the New York State Parole Board to the full Senate following rounds of questioning about victims' roles, public-safety standards and rehabilitation.
The nominees — former Assembly member Danny O'Donnell, attorney Darlene Rave Bruce, attorney and former prosecutor Elizabeth Case, and former Newark Police Commissioner Jose Gomez — each described their backgrounds and answered senators' questions about how they would evaluate parole cases. The committee conducted a voice vote and completed an official ballot count; the chair said the ballots had been counted and “all of these nominees will be moving to the floor.”
The hearing probed similar themes across nominees: whether commissioners should "retry" convictions, how to weigh victim impact statements, how to evaluate rehabilitation and risk, and how commissioners would apply statutes and parole regulations. Several senators pressed nominees on cases involving serious violent offenses and on whether a parole commissioner could guarantee someone would not reoffend.
Danny O'Donnell, who served in the State Assembly and chaired that chamber's corrections committee, told senators he had visited dozens of prisons while in office and said he would "follow the law" when serving on the parole board. He said family connections and stable housing help predict post-release outcomes, and that in his corrections oversight he had seen superintendents agree that some people "don't belong there anymore." O'Donnell described his long experience as a public defender and legislator and said he would weigh public-safety risk against evidence of transformation.
Darlene Rave Bruce described decades of legal work on corrections monitoring, consent decrees and reentry services, and discussed volunteer work assisting families and formerly incarcerated people in Harlem. She said she would review each parole "package" — the file, victim statements and institutional records — and decide whether the record supported release. "It is my belief that I acquired skills that have prepared me to sit as a fair and objective commissioner on the parole board," she told the committees.
Elizabeth Case, who cited experience as an assistant district attorney, criminal defense attorney and village justice, said she would "approach every case with an open mind, a steady hand, and a deep respect for the law and the lives it touches." She emphasized that commissioners must consider victim statements when provided, but that the board's role is not to relitigate convictions; rather, she said, commissioners must review the record and apply the law in each case.
Jose Gomez, the former Newark police commissioner who described a multiyear decline in violent crime in that city, told senators he would not deny release solely because law-enforcement officials opposed it: "I would not," he said, adding that decisions must consider victim statements, statute and policy and be applied consistently. He described efforts in Newark to combine enforcement, community engagement and post-release supports for people returning from incarceration.
Committee members asked nominees whether they would visit prisons and hubs where records are housed. Several nominees said they had visited or planned to visit facilities; O'Donnell noted that many hearings still require travel because records are not digitized. Senators also asked nominees whether they could set aside personal views and follow statutory standards; nominees repeatedly said they would apply the law and review the whole record.
At the conclusion of the meeting, committee chairs confirmed that ballots were counted for both committees and that the nominations would be reported to the Senate floor for consideration. The committee record shows no individual roll-call tally reported on the record during the session; the chairs said the official counts will be entered into the committee minutes.
The nominations now move to the full Senate calendar for floor consideration.

