Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vacancies Special Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission opens review of vacancy process after recent contested appointment; seeks clearer deadlines
Summary
In light of recent contested appointments and the cost of special elections, the charter review commission discussed adding time limits and fallback appointment authority to the charter's vacancy provisions and asked staff to research legal precedents and prior charter language.
Commissioners reviewed section 2.4, the charter's vacancies provision, and discussed several possible fixes after recent experience with a protracted appointment process and a subsequent special election.
Members suggested adding a time frame that would require the City Council to appoint a successor within a specified period, and if the council failed to act, to give the mayor default appointment authority after that deadline. Commissioners noted such a two-step approach would preserve council authority but prevent long vacancies when the council cannot reach consensus.
The group also discussed making special-election scheduling clearer in the charter so timelines and costs are known in advance. Several commissioners said the city incurred substantial costs and administrative complexity during the last vacancy-scheduling episode, and recommended exploring language that would allow filling vacancies at the next general election when feasible to reduce costs.
The commission asked staff to research: (1) previous charter language and earlier processes for filling vacancies, (2) state or county statutes or guidance about default appointment authority (including whether the governor could ever intervene), and (3) Board of Elections deadlines that affect special-election timing.
Ending: Staff will return with example language and any relevant statutory or administrative constraints for further drafting.
