Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes Summary topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: minutes, wireless permit, CIP conformity and RS‑4000 referral

3670848 · June 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the meeting the commission approved the May 8 minutes and took three substantive actions: adopted a resolution approving the AT&T wireless permit (PC2025‑8), found the FY2025–26 CIP in conformity with the General Plan, and voted to receive and file (no referral) on a proposed RS‑4000 zoning option; all motions passed 5‑0.

This Votes at a Glance summarizes formal actions taken by the Cerritos Planning Commission at the meeting.

Approved items

1) Approval of minutes — Motion by Commissioner Au, second by Commissioner Chauhan. Vote: 5‑0. The commission approved the May 8, 2025 special meeting minutes after staff corrected an error in the minutes noted by a commissioner and republished the unofficial minutes on the city website.

2) Wireless Telecommunication Permit 2025‑1 — Adopted Resolution PC2025‑8 approving the installation of a new AT&T wireless facility on an existing SCE transmission tower. Motion by Commissioner Jabari; second by Commissioner Au. Vote: 5‑0. Staff determined the project categorically exempt from CEQA and imposed a project‑specific condition on the equipment‑enclosure exterior materials.

3) Capital Improvement Program (FY2025–26) — Motion by Vice Chair Reyes; second by Commissioner Gaveri to find the proposed CIP in conformity with the Cerritos General Plan. Vote: 5‑0. Staff presented a CIP budget figure of approximately $23,000,000 and reviewed projects across facilities, parks, streets, sewer and water.

4) RS‑4000 zoning referral request — Motion by Commissioner Al, second by Vice Chair Reyes to receive and file the staff report and take no further action (do not refer to City Council). Vote: 5‑0. Staff advised that creating a new zone in a built‑out city would require extensive CEQA and code work and could risk spot‑zoning concerns; staff cited an example CEQA cost on the order of $100,000 for a comparable rezoning analysis.

Other procedural notes

- Several items were informational (for example, Chick‑fil‑A minor precise plan) and were referred to staff for administrative processing; signage will require separate permits where noted. - Electronic voting encountered technical issues in two items; the commission completed both votes with verbal roll‑call voting.