Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Claims And Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Milwaukee committee recommends denials on multiple property- damage claims, approves select payments and several city resolutions

2663898 · March 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Judiciary and Legislation Committee on March 17 reviewed multiple property-damage claims, authorized several employee payments, recommended denial of several claims tied to tree failures and approved the write-off of $269,169.02 in uncollectable receivables.

The Judiciary and Legislation Committee on March 17, 2025 reviewed a slate of property-damage claims, authorized several payments related to employee injury claims, and approved administrative and policy measures including a $269,169.02 write-off of uncollectable receivables.

The committee heard more than a half-dozen homeowner and vehicle- damage appeals, many connected to storm-damaged trees. For multiple claims the city attorneys office recommended denial on grounds the city had no prior notice of internal tree decay or other actionable negligence; the committee followed that recommendation in several cases. In one sanitation-related case the committee approved a claim for fence damage.

Why it matters: The committees recommendations go to the full Common Council; if the council adopts them, claimants may receive formal denials (a prerequisite for filing suit) or payments as directed. The write-off and other administrative actions affect the citys accounting and collections practices.

Key outcomes (votes at a glance)

- Jack Ryback appeal (Resolution 240940): City attorney recommended denial after firefighters said forced entry was necessary. Motion to deny moved by Alderman Regalis; committee proceeded without objection and recommended denial. (Transcript evidence: "Resolution relating to the appeal of Jack Ryback for property damage." and discussion by city attorney/clerk.)

- Jim and Jackie Wheelock (Resolution 2241593): Claim for $1,340.06 for fence damage allegedly caused by a sanitation truck. Claimant provided photos and two repair estimates; Alderman Gellis moved approval of the claim for $1,340.06. The motion was adopted without recorded objection. (Transcript evidence: claimant testimony and motion to approve.)

- Tamika Ruffin (Resolution 241539): Claim for vehicle damage after a tree fell. Forestry staff said the failure involved internal decay not visible from outside and there was no prior service request; city attorney recommended denial. Motion to deny carried with a recorded 3-1 vote (one member objected). (Transcript evidence: forestry description of interior decay; committee vote recorded "3 1 in denial.")

- Anna Harmon, Okeh Eaglenag, Marina Diaz and other tree-fall vehicle claims (Resolutions 241540; 241541; 241542 and similar): Forestry witnesses said failures were caused by internal decay or storm events and that there were no prior service requests for the specific trees at issue; the committee recommended denial in each of these matters after testimony. Some claimants were told the committee recommendation will be conveyed to the full Common Council on April 2 and that a formal denial would allow circuit-court action. In the Diaz matter the department agreed to follow up to confirm whether a neighbor complaint or mark on the tree predated the failure; the committee left open the possibility of reconsideration if the department locates contrary records. (Transcript evidence: multiple forestry reports and claimant statements.)

- Kenneth Hill (Resolution 241544): Claim for vehicle damage from a downed branch. Forestry reported the tree appeared healthy externally; the committee ultimately denied the claim after voting 3-1. (Transcript evidence: forestry report and recorded vote.)

- Employee liability payments and outside-counsel approvals: The committee authorized payments recommended by the city attorney for three employee-related claims arising from uninsured motorists: $15,000 to Elrich Irving (Resolution 24212044), $25,000 to James English (Resolution 241670), and $25,000 to Jesse Wilkinson (Resolution 241671). Those three items were adopted by the committee without recorded objections. The committee also authorized an agreement with outside counsel (Veil Banks & Associates) in the matter Biden Hstead v. City of Milwaukee following a closed-session discussion; that item passed 3-1. (Transcript evidence: city attorneys introduction and motions to adopt.)

- Uncollectable receivables write-off: The committee approved removing $269,169.02 in receivables from city books after the City Comptroller explained the statutory and accounting rationale for write-offs that exceed $5,000 per invoice. The comptroller and DPW said many of the debts were past statutes of limitations, had insufficient evidence for collection, or had been turned back by the citys collection firm. Committee adoption was recorded without objection. (Transcript evidence: Comptroller Bill Christiansen and DPW Business Operations Manager Dylan Westfall.)

- Policy resolutions adopted: The committee adopted several policy resolutions and positions and sent them on to the full Common Council, including a substitute resolution supporting reinstatement of a state movie-and-TV production tax credit (Item 10); a resolution opposing proposed federal legislation to allow a president a third term (Item 11); and related items. Those were adopted without recorded objection at committee. (Transcript evidence: sponsors and intergovernmental staff.)

What happens next: The committees recommendations will be transmitted to the full Common Council at its next regular meeting on April 2, 2025. If the Common Council adopts the committees recommendations, payments or formal denials will be executed and claimants will receive formal notice from the City Clerks office.

Sources and evidence: The committee record, city attorney presentations, testimony from claimants and DPW/Forestry staff, the City Comptroller, and motions recorded in the March 17 docket.