Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate concurs in bill clarifying injunction test after Montana Supreme Court ruling
Summary
House Bill 409 passed second reading in the Senate. The bill clarifies the intended injunction standard lawmakers adopted previously, instructing courts to weigh each element equally rather than apply a sliding-scale approach, and generated debate over judicial independence.
House Bill 409, which clarifies how Montana courts should evaluate the tests for preliminary injunctions, was concurred in on second reading by the Senate on March 17 after floor debate.
Sponsor and proponents told senators the bill responds to a Montana Supreme Court interpretation that they said applied a “sliding scale” approach to injunctions; the bill would require courts to consider each injunction element independently and not rely on a sliding-scale balancing that allows greater support for one element to offset weaker support for others.
Why it matters: The bill addresses a technical legal standard with implications for how trial courts and appellate courts evaluate requests for preliminary injunctions in Montana cases. Backers described it as legislative clarification of intent from earlier legislation.
On the floor, proponents characterized the measure as restoring the legislative intent of a prior session’s change to the injunction standard, which they said directed Montana courts to follow U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Opponents characterized the bill as an attempt to limit the Supreme Court’s use of certain precedents and as judicial overreach by the Legislature.
Action: The Senate recorded 32 senators voting aye and 18 voting nay; the bill was concurred in on second reading.
What’s next: The bill proceeds in the legislative process. Debate indicated potential for legal and judicial-branch interest as courts and litigants consider the statutory language going forward.
