Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance And Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Executive committee weighs virtual meeting length and tighter time limits for electeds and public
Summary
Members raised concerns about long virtual full-board meetings and proposed procedural changes: shorter time allotments, pre-submitted concise questions, sharing electeds' reports in chat, and rules to reduce repetitive or long preambles.
Executive committee members said virtual platforms have improved attendance but produced long meetings; they proposed procedural changes to keep meetings shorter and more focused.
Patricia and several members said a recent full board meeting ran more than four hours. Members suggested limits for elected officials’ remarks, tighter time caps for public comment, requiring concise, specific questions, and sharing elected officials’ written reports in the chat so members may reserve questions for new matters.
Carter proposed a format of “speed round” questions that are brief and focused and said staff would ask elected officials to limit remarks. Valerie and others urged individual board members to be concise and to prioritize questions that benefit the wider community rather than long personal preambles. Robin proposed collecting questions in the chat in advance of the meeting so liaisons could respond succinctly.
The committee agreed to pursue several operational changes: encourage submission of succinct questions in chat, ask electeds to limit time, and explore training for members on concise questioning. No formal rule change or vote was adopted during the executive committee meeting; staff said they would follow up with elected officials and circulate guidance ahead of the next full board session.
