Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Restaurant Op License topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mollusca proprietors describe mussel-focused restaurant; committee presses on hours, music and sidewalk seating
Summary
Applicants for Mollusca (1 Little West 12th Street) described a full-service seafood restaurant built around mussel dishes and sought an OP-to-OP transfer, sidewalk-cafe seating and limited live acoustic music; committee and neighbors flagged concerns about late hours, prior operators' compliance and building permits/TCO status.
Get email alerts on the Restaurant Op License topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Owners and representatives seeking an on-premises liquor license for a new concept called Mollusca (also referred to in testimony as Miluska/Miloska) at 1 Little West 12th Street presented their plan to Community Board 2’s Licensing Committee. The applicants described a full-service seafood restaurant whose signature offering is mussel bowls; they said the concept operates in Russia and that this would be the group’s first U.S. location.
Why it matters
Neighbors and committee members voiced concern because the block already has heavy sidewalk seating density, and because the prior tenant at the address generated contentious permit and operating-history questions. Committee members pressed the applicants on hours, sidewalk-cafe size, music, events and whether those operating the new restaurant have verifiable New York experience.
What applicants said
Representative Max Bookman said the application is an OP-to-OP transfer; he and the named operators described plans for a 9-table sidewalk cafe (18 seats) and asked for the committee’s usual stipulations on door/window closing. The applicants told the committee they would forgo DJs and amplified live music after resident feedback and would limit live music to occasional acoustic performers; they said they would keep doors closed during any live performances. On private events the applicants proposed 4–6 private closures per year for the restaurant; they said promoters would not be used and that events would be run by the restaurant.
Neighbor and committee concerns
Neighbors raised multiple issues: (1) density of sidewalk seating on the block (Bagatelle and other businesses already have large outdoor footprints), (2) potential crowding on cobblestone/open-street pedestrian corridors, (3) prior operator noncompliance at the site and (4) uncertainty about certificates of occupancy/TCOs and building permits. Committee members asked for clarity about who would be physically present and managing the restaurant; applicants said one of the managers (Evgeny/Eugene Yevgeniy Zhuravidov) would run operations on-site while owner-licensee Eric Agababayev would be on the license. Applicants said other partners have restaurant experience in Russia and that the manager has restaurant operations experience in New York.
Operational details discussed
- License/transfer: OP-to-OP transfer (previous tenant listed as Coco/meat packers); applicants said they were seeking the same hours as the prior operator but acknowledged ambiguity in the prior operator’s advertised hours. - Hours: committee pressed applicants to accept more restricted hours; applicants suggested typical committee stipulations could be acceptable (closing by 10–11 p.m. on weekdays/weekends respectively), but requested later hours for weekend nights. Some committee members opposed granting 2 a.m. hours and suggested midnight or 1 a.m. as limits for inexperienced operators. - Sidewalk cafe: applicants requested a sidewalk cafe (they referenced prior sidewalk seating numbers roughly 12 tables/24 seats but later asked for 9 tables/18 seats); applicants said any sidewalk seating would close at the premises’ closing time and would conform to Department of Consumer Affairs rules. - Music and doors: applicants agreed (on the record) not to have DJs and not to have amplified live bands; they said occasional acoustic performers could be permitted if doors were closed during performances and that live music would end earlier than hard closing hours. - Private events: applicants proposed 4–6 private closures a year; committee members sought limits and clarity about promoters and buyouts. - Building permits/TCO: applicants and committee discussed existing Department of Buildings/Certificate of Occupancy issues. Applicants said a stop-work situation and prior owner’s permit issues led to delays; they said they will secure an active TCO and required permits before opening and are working with an architect and expediting firm.
Where it stands
No vote or final resolution is recorded in the transcript excerpt. Multiple committee members said they would recommend tighter limits on late-night hours for operators without a local track record and asked the applicants to provide verified documentation on DOB/TCO status and to formalize specific stipulations on music, hours and sidewalk seating before the board votes.

