Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Agriculture Honey Beekeeping topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs compromise allowing small beekeepers to bottle honey for retail with registration and minimum sanitary standards

2661834 · March 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Kansas Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee voted to pass House Bill 2158 favorably as amended, approving a compromise that allows small beekeepers to bottle and sell packaged honey at retail without a full food-establishment license if they register at no cost and meet department-issued minimum sanitary packaging standards.

The Kansas Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee voted to pass House Bill 2158 favorably as amended, adopting a compromise that allows qualifying beekeepers to sell packaged honey and honeycombs at retail without holding a full food-establishment license.

Reviser Lawrence told the committee that House Bill 2158 “would permit beekeepers who meet certain requirements to sell packaged honey and honeycombs without holding a food establishment or food processing plant license.” Senator Titus offered an amendment that the committee approved and described as a compromise: it limits retail sales under the exemption to $25,000 annually (down from a previously discussed $50,000 threshold), requires at-cost registration with the Kansas Department of Agriculture, allows the department to issue minimum sanitary standards limited to packaging and bottling, and requires labeling that the product is “not subject to routine inspection” if the producer lacks a full license. The registration carries no fee, Senator Titus said.

Supporters and committee members emphasized the distinction between peer-to-peer/farmers-market sales and placing product into retail. Senator Bowser, who said he had experience in the honey industry, argued for the amendment and noted food-safety evidence in testimony: “There’s been honey found in Egyptian tombs from 3,000 years ago, and you can eat it today and not get sick,” he said in committee remarks.

Committee members asked several clarifying questions. Senator Fagg and others raised labeling and font-size concerns for required disclosures; Senator Tydius asked whether the department’s sanitary standards might become more burdensome than legislative intent; Senator Titus said the amendment limits department authority to sanitary standards for packaging and registration was intended to provide traceability if a health issue arose. Senator Alley confirmed the registration is with the Department of Agriculture, not Wildlife and Parks; Titus said the registration is “no cost.” Senator Bowser moved that the committee pass the bill out favorably as amended; Senator Francisco seconded and the motion passed by voice vote.

Actions

- motion: "Adopt amendment limiting retail-exemption threshold to $25,000, require no-cost registration, allow department to adopt minimum sanitary packaging standards, and require label disclosure when not subject to routine inspection"; mover: Senator Titus; second: (implicit during discussion); vote_record: voice vote (aye); outcome: approved; notes: amendment described as compromise to protect small operators and sanitary concerns.

- motion: "Pass House Bill 2158 favorably as amended"; mover: Senator Bowser; second: Senator Francisco; vote_record: voice vote (aye); outcome: approved; notes: bill headed to Senate floor as amended.

Speakers

[{"name":"Reviser Lawrence","role_title":"Statutory reviser","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Titus","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Bowser","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Ware","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Fagg","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Alley","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Francisco","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Shane","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"},{"name":"Senator Starnes","role_title":"Senator","affiliation_type":"government"}]

Authorities

[{"type":"policy","name":"Department of Agriculture minimum sanitary standards for packaging (proposed)","citation":"to be adopted by Department rules","referenced_by":["HB2158"]}]

Clarifying_details

[{"category":"retail sales cap","detail":"Cap for exemption set at $25,000 annual retail sales (reduced from prior discussion of $50,000)","value":25000,"units":"USD","approximate":false,"source_speaker":"Senator Titus"},{"category":"registration fee","detail":"Registration with the Kansas Department of Agriculture is required and explicitly at no cost","value":0,"units":"USD","approximate":false,"source_speaker":"Senator Titus"},{"category":"labeling","detail":"If producer is not subject to routine inspection, the product must carry a disclosure label indicating that","source_speaker":"Senator Titus"},{"category":"packaging standards scope","detail":"Department authority limited to minimum sanitary standards for packaging and bottling, not full commercial kitchen requirements","source_speaker":"Senator Titus"}]

Proper_names

[{"name":"Kansas Department of Agriculture","type":"agency"},{"name":"Kansas Beekeeper Association","type":"organization"},{"name":"House Bill 2158","type":"other"},{"name":"ChargePoint","type":"business"},{"name":"Evergy","type":"business"}]

Community_relevance

{"geographies":["Kansas"],"funding_sources":[],"impact_groups":["small-scale beekeepers","retail grocery buyers","consumers concerned with labeling and sanitation"]}

Provenance

[{"block_id":"seg-1783-1795","local_start":0,"local_end":80,"evidence_excerpt":"House Bill 2,158 would permit beekeepers who meet certain requirements to sell packaged honey and honeycombs without holding a food establishment or food processing plant license.","reason_code":"topicintro"},{"block_id":"seg-1888-1927","local_start":0,"local_end":210,"evidence_excerpt":"So what I'm proposing in this amendment here is is sort of a compromised position that that will, protect some of the sanitary concerns, as well as kind of keep that existing balance.","reason_code":"topicfinish"}]