Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agriculture Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission forwards agritourism code changes to county commission with conditions
Summary
Weber County planners recommended the county commission approve updated agritourism rules aimed at clarifying qualifying farm operations, limiting activity footprints and standardizing requirements across agricultural zoning districts. The commission asked staff to align proof-of-production requirements with the Farmland Assessment Act.
Weber County planners voted to forward revised agritourism regulations to the county commission, recommending a set of changes intended to tighten definitions, standardize where agritourism is allowed and clarify production proof requirements.
Planning staff told the commission the changes came after a year of review and public input intended to preserve agricultural production while creating limited on-site options to help farms earn income. The draft amendment adds two explicit agricultural-commercial uses in agricultural zones: on-site agricultural produce sales and community-oriented agriculture (examples: community gardens, U-pick operations). It also clarifies that agritourism activities must be accessory and incidental to a primary agricultural operation unless the activity itself is routine cultivation or harvesting.
To avoid unintended loopholes, staff proposed limits on the size and location of activity areas for agritourism operations (a formula tied to farm acreage and building footprint), minimum ownership or operational-history requirements, and a requirement that planning staff may request proof of production if there is reason to suspect an applicant—9s operation is not agricultural. The planning commission asked staff to ensure such proof-of-production requirements are consistent with the state—9s Farmland Assessment Act and to add language clarifying how fallow or replanting periods are handled for perennial crops.
Commissioners also discussed how to treat multi-parcel farming operations and whether parcels that are part of a single farm business but not contiguous should count together; staff revised the draft to ensure parcels that are part of the same agricultural operation may be considered together for the purposes of agritourism eligibility.
After limited public comment, the planning commission voted to recommend approval subject to two conditions: (1) rewrite the proof-of-production language to match the Farmland Assessment Act exemptions and standards for crops in rotation or orchards in replanting; and (2) clarify that agricultural produce sales may be associated with the same agricultural operation even if the crop acres are on non-contiguous parcels that are under common operation.
Next steps: the recommended ordinance changes will be transmitted to the county commission for a legislative decision. Planning staff said the county—9s timeline requires the commission to forward recommendations so the county commission has time to consider the changes before state deadlines for adoption of such ordinances.
