Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Efficiency Grant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Middletown board approves $5 million NYSERDA grant amendment for Twin Towers geothermal project
Summary
The Enlarged City School District of Middletown approved a $5 million grant amendment from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) to support geothermal work at Twin Towers and extended the related contract until project completion.
Get email alerts on the Energy Efficiency Grant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board of education of the Enlarged City School District of Middletown voted Jan. 16 to accept a $5,000,000 grant amendment from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority and extend the related contract until the Twin Towers project is finished.
The action was contained in the district's financial memorandum (14D) and was moved by Mitchell Williams and seconded by Ms. Romero. The motion carried unanimously, 7-0.
District staff member Mr. Tuttle told the board the award grew in two phases: an initial $4,000,000 award tied to the Twin Towers project, followed by a second award of $1,000,000. "So this is just approving the $5,000,000 grant from NYSERDA and extending the contract, out till the project's done," Tuttle said during the meeting.
Board members did not ask additional questions after the brief presentation and voted to approve the financial memorandum, which included the NYSERDA item among other financial items on the consent portion of the agenda.
Clarifying details recorded at the meeting: the two-track NYSERDA award was described on the record as $4,000,000 (track 1) plus an additional $1,000,000 (track 2), for a total of $5,000,000; the approval extends an existing contract until project completion. The agenda listed the item under financial memorandum 14D, numbers 1 through 10.
The board took the vote as part of a consent-style package of routine financial items; there was no separate, later recorded debate about project scope or schedule during the meeting.
The district did not provide a timeline for project completion or any additional contract or local-match obligations during the public discussion on Jan. 16.

