Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Procurement Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves broad procurement reform bill with new evaluation factors and BPW study requirement
Summary
The Health and Government Operations Committee adopted amendments and passed House Bill 500, a comprehensive administration bill that revises Maryland procurement law to alter governance, minority business rules, payment practices, and master contracting terms.
The Health and Government Operations Committee adopted amendments and passed House Bill 500, a comprehensive administration bill that revises Marylandprocurement law to alter governance, minority business rules, payment practices, and master contracting terms, and to introduce new requirements related to labor and diversity practices.
Key elements of the bill include clarifying that Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) and Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) procurements of supplies and services include information technology supplies subject to Title 3.5 of the State Finance and Procurement law; authorizing the Chief Procurement Officer to use other source-selection methods only with Board of Public Works (BPW) approval; requiring task-order solicitations to master contractors on a rotating basis; restoring a requirement that proposals identify specific confirmed Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) commitments at submission; and replacing a proposed good labor practices preference with a good labor practices evaluation factor for competitive sealed proposals. The bill also reduces the dollar threshold for contract modifications the procurement officer may approve, removes a departmental working-group requirement on prompt payment, and instead directs the procurement advisor to BPW to study the economic impacts of instituting an in-state preference for Maryland vendors.
Delia Kerr, the primary sponsor, told the committee the bill "was extensively negotiated with all stakeholders." Kerr summarized: "Essentially there are 2 parts to it. 1 deals with the Board of Public Works, The other deals with procurement with the prime contractors, subcontractors, and, and the labor organizations." Vice Chair Collison praised the negotiation process, calling it "one of the most difficult negotiations I've observed" and thanking Kerr for pulling parties together.
Committee members confirmed laborand several executive offices participated in negotiations; a member reported that "Labor is 100% on board with the amendments," while the treasurer's office "is not completely happy" but indicated it would yield to the legislature's will. The amendments (packet A1) were moved and seconded; the committee voted to pass the bill as amended.
What the committee decided: amendments in packet A1 were adopted and the committee voted to pass HB500 as amended. The transcript does not include a roll-call tally or a detailed fiscal estimate in committee; sponsors described the bill as the product of multi-stakeholder compromise.
What remains to be decided: the bill moves forward with amendments; the procurement advisor to BPW is directed to conduct a study on a potential in-state vendor preference and other implementation details will be decided in subsequent stages.
