Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Vouchers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances changes to statewide rental-assistance voucher program amid questions about benefit formula
Summary
Lawmakers adopted committee amendments and advanced a bill altering eligibility and administration of the statewide rental-assistance voucher program after extended floor questions about who pays what share of rent and whether the change increases or tightens eligibility.
The House adopted committee amendments and advanced House file "House 7 16" on March 4, a bill that alters eligibility and administrative rules for the statewide rental-assistance voucher program.
The bill, described on the floor as altering the program’s definition of “public housing agency” and changing how voucher funding is allocated among jurisdictions, was amended to allow public housing agencies to administer the state program and to adjust the method the Department uses to determine distributions. "Amendment number 1 is technical. Amendment number 2 authorizes public housing agencies to administer the state program in accordance with its local administrative plan," the floor leader said when moving the changes; the House adopted the amendments and the favorable report as amended was accepted.
Members pressed staff on the program’s cost-sharing formula. One member asked for clarification about whether the measure would change the portion of income families are expected to pay. The floor leader explained on the record that the program is administered using existing funds and that the state does not increase the dollar amount allocated by the bill: "As we all know, there is a huge waiting list for voucher funding ... we're not increasing this money at all," the floor leader said. The floor leader also described the program as a pass-through combining federal and state funds: "They’re not all federal funds. It's in the state budget as well. But again ... we are not increasing the state budget funds."
Other members and the floor leader described the bill’s effect on the tenant share of rent differently on the floor. One member summarized: "...the bill makes tenants pay more ... the bill changes the number from a tenant cannot pay more than expected to be paying more than 30% of the rent, increases it to 40%." The floor leader, answering subsequent questions, described the bill as “tightening the eligibility” so that tenants contribute more of their own money in order to serve more households with the same funding. Another member and the floor leader earlier described the program in terms of a change from 40% to 30% in the calculation discussed on the floor, and members explicitly questioned that point. On the floor, members exchanged different descriptions of whether the change reduces the family share from 40% to 30% or increases a tenant’s expected share; the transcript records both characterizations.
The House did not take a final third-reading vote on the measure during the session excerpted here; after debate and questions the bill was ordered printed for third reading. The bill’s committee amendments and the floor discussion were recorded in the House journal and on the session transcript.
Why it matters: The voucher program is the state’s main mechanism for subsidizing rents for very low-income households. Changes to the way family contribution is calculated or to administrative rules can alter how many households receive assistance and how jurisdictions prioritize limited funds.
Votes and next steps: The House adopted the committee amendments and the favorable report as amended and ordered the bill printed for third reading. No final passage vote appears in the provided transcript excerpt.
