Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Absentee Ballots topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Subcommittee explores notarized envelopes and witnesses to authenticate absentee ballots

2633900 · March 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers discussed changing absentee-ballot procedures to strengthen voter authentication and chain-of-custody, including proposals for a notarized affidavit envelope and authorized witnesses for nursing homes, corrections facilities and overseas voters.

The House Election Law Subcommittee discussed proposals to strengthen authentication and chain-of-custody for absentee ballots, including expanding the list of authorized witnesses who may verify and sign voter affidavits.

Chair and witnesses cited gaps in current absentee procedures where ballots mailed or returned without an election official's direct verification sometimes lack a clear third-party confirmation that the identified voter cast the ballot.

What was proposed: Representative C and other members described a possible "voter authentication affidavit envelope" that would allow a notary public or an authorized official to confirm a voter's identity and witness the ballot-handling process. The subcommittee identified several classes of potential witnesses beyond traditional notaries: nursing-home administrators, county corrections superintendents, a hospital official for long-term patients, and other public officials. Kate Horgan of Secure Democracy described an administrative option to expand DMV-Secretary-of-State data sharing so already-verified documents (for Real ID holders who opt in) could be reflected on the voter checklist.

Witness testimony and practical constraints: Mike O'Brien and others cautioned that New Hampshire's law does not allow bifurcating federal and state ballots and that ballots counted "on the same day" raise constitutional and logistical constraints; the panel also heard that not all states permit provisional ballots or deferred counting in the same way. Members discussed embossing and placement of notary seals so envelope handling would not damage returned ballots or the ballot-reading equipment.

Special circumstances: County representatives and Secure Democracy urged the panel to preserve verification options for nursing-home residents and county jail detainees, who often vote absentee and may not have conventional photo ID or immediate family access to documents. County officials noted that notaries sometimes refuse unpaid pro bono work and urged expanding the pool of authorized witnesses rather than relying wholly on notaries.

Next steps: The subcommittee asked staff to draft statutory language for a notarized or otherwise witnessed absentee-envelope procedure and to clarify which classes of officials could serve as authorized witnesses. The chair also asked staff to work with the Secretary of State on operational details such as envelope design (space for seals placed on the flap to avoid ballot damage) and municipal training guidance.

Ending: No formal votes were taken. The subcommittee will review draft language and operational guidance at its next meeting.