Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mobile Food Vendors topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends removing temporary-permit requirement for food trucks to align with state law
Summary
Saratoga Springs planners recommended adopting a code amendment to move food trucks out of the temporary use permit section (no application fee) and to add state-compliant standards; commissioners chose the option to remove a permit requirement while retaining enforcement authority for noncompliance.
The Saratoga Springs Planning Commission on March 13 voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to amend Title 19 of the city’s Land Development Code to bring the city’s food truck rules into compliance with recent state law changes.
City senior planner Joanne presented two options: (1) move food trucks out of the temporary use permit section so the city would not require an application permit for most food-truck operations and instead enforce state-compliant standards through code enforcement; or (2) retain food trucks in the temporary use permit process but not collect application fees, with an additional requirement that a site plan be provided for any food truck that operates more than 10 hours per week in a single location.
Staff said recent state law eliminates the ability of cities to collect application fees associated with mobile food vendors and that the proposed language would replicate state definitions and enforcement approaches. Staff noted that pending applications have been processed to comply with state law and that the city had rarely processed temporary use permits for food trucks (a handful per year).
Commission discussion weighed administrative simplicity for vendors against staff workload and enforcement. Commissioners asked about typical review timelines (staff said about two weeks for a complete temporary-use application) and enforcement frequency (staff said the city typically enforces 2–3 times per year for noncompliant vendors). Commissioners also discussed how rules would interact with special events and downtown festival planning; staff noted that special-event permits would still be required for organized events on city property.
After discussion, Commissioner Hill moved to forward a recommendation for approval of the proposed code amendments (chapters 19.02 and 19.05) adopting option 1 (remove temporary use permit requirement and adopt state-compliant standards); Commissioner Mangum seconded. The motion passed unanimously. The planning staff asked to be notified if there is an uptick in noncompliance so the commission can revisit the approach if needed.
